Consent must be given, it is never assumed

So there I was, thinking about the logic of the title statement. If a door to a house is open, does that mean you have consent to enter it? If a car boot is open, does that automatically mean you can help yourself to whatever is in it?

Of course not. This is one of the foundational pillars of a private property based society (i.e, a free society). Consent must be given. Now it should come as no surprise that the ever growing state seems to think it is above this basic rule (although nobody gave them consent to it). This little fact on its own should convince any and everyone that a revolution is needed. In a democracy the consent of the majority can override that of the minority. The truth is, there is no majority or minority. These are collectivist conveniences. There are only individuals. Only in a totalitarian, Marxist-style system can anyone (or group) demand the stripping of private property from another. Perfect for the ‘abolish private property’ mantra of collectivist ideologies such as socialism, communism, feminism and environmentalism.

I am about to opt out of this NHS corporate data mining project, called Summary Care Records. I have to opt out, because apparently the state was already decided that I want to opt in. They didn’t ask me obviously. Just like they didn’t ask me about bailing out banks and charging me the bill (illegal), going to war in the Middle East (illegal) and so on.

Consent is important, so are ‘rights’. They, like sunlight from the sun, are consequences of ownership. Simply put, you only have rights (consent is one) over things you own (such as yourself). Things you don’t own you have no rights over.

Simple isn’t it.

I don’t have the legal right to give you consent to enter someone else’s home and start eating out their fridge, any more than I can’t give you consent to have sex with that girl over there.

This applies to absolutely everyone. No one is exempt. It is the Great Equaliser. Socialist constructs like The Human Rights Act are not only disruptive to this logic, it is illegal (I’ll deal with this in another post). We are all equal in our rights over our own property and equally powerless over anyone else’s. Society, (from the beggar all the way up to the government) is composed of individuals. ‘Government’ doesn’t exist as a real thing, it is a virtual object that describes a group of individuals, nothing more. As such, the government should have no rights to assume consent of your property (your medical data, your organs or whatever).

They can’t do this because they don’t own you, right? I mean, if they did then you would be a slave in every meaning of the word. If they owned you, they would be able take money directly out of your pay check before you even get it. They could fine you arbitrarily, stop you from gathering as free people and protesting, ignore you when you actively reject government proposals, sell your private data to corporations, shoot you in the head because you ‘don’t look right’, pass laws purely for the purpose of taking more of your money, call you all racists and bigots for asking questions about changes in your local area, they can even sign you up to legal contracts so foreigners can tell you how you live your life and charge you hundreds of billions while they do it and even give voting rights to people who aren’t British. They could take the currency you have to use as payment for the use of your property (body) for production (provision of goods and services) and deliberately devalue it. They could borrow money from private banks that charge interest and demand you pay it.

Wait a minute…

How To Film a News Report

Watch this.

BBC doesn't know how much of your money they spend

Who gives a fuck how much, it isn't like the BBC have to actually pay for it or anything.

The corporation did not know in advance how much it would spend covering individual events, from the Beijing Olympics to the Glastonbury festival, because so many departments were involved and they did not liaise on budgets, according to a damning National Audit Office report.

As a result, the corporation was unable to assess whether or not it offered value for money, it said.

The total expenditure for sport and music events in the 2008-09 financial year was £357 million, including coverage and rights. The public spending watchdog singled out the BBC’s construction of a £250,000 studio in Vienna for the Euro 2008 football championships because the one allocated did not have a backdrop of the city skyline.

No accountability leads to ever growing inefficiency and self indulgence, no difference if it is with foreign aid, the welfare state or any other state (taxpayer) funded system.

State propaganda

Stop smoking. Drink less. Learn new skills. Stop defrauding the benefit office. Claim tax credits. Wear a condom. Join the Army.

Britons are being bombarded by more than 10,000 government advertisements every day, prompting accusations that Labour is creating the "ultimate nanny state".

Messages from the state were relayed to the population via television, radio, cinema, newspapers, magazines and billboards on more than 3.7 million occasions during 2008, according to new research by media analysts at The Nielsen Company.

Current major campaigns include the Department of Health's "Condom – Essential Wear" campaign to promote safe sex, a police initiative to publicise the Anti-Terrorist Hotline, and the Department for Transport's "Think! Bike" campaign to encourage drivers to look out for motorcyclists.

The government is now the biggest spender on advertising in the country.

Its spending has increased by 20 per cent this year to more than £400 million at a time when the previous biggest spender, the corporate giant Procter & Gamble, has been cutting back.

Almost half a bil to tell the peasants how to think and act. Free nation my arse. Let us not forget the quangocracy and the fake charities. Billions of your money, taken off of you without your consent and used to brainwash you.

Fuck the government. They shouldn't even have an advertising budget, their job is to administer the law and protect property rights, the rest can be done by local governments and the people.

This is also an opportunity for me to post this webpage regarding psywar using the corporate media as a vector.

BRAINWASHING: How The British Use The Media for Mass Psychological Warfare

"I know the secret of making the average American believe anything I want him to. Just let me control television.... You put something on the television and it becomes reality. If the world outside the TV set contradicts the images, people start trying to change the world to make it like the TV set images....'' --Hal Becker, media ``expert'' and management consultant, the Futures Group, in an interview in 1981

Cocaine Socialism

Television executives who take cocaine are often praised for their 'off-the-wall' brilliance instead of reprimanded, according to a former BBC producer.

Sarah Graham, who has worked for Children's BBC, Radio 5, and Channel 4's The Big Breakfast, said drug use remained rife in the industry and was not isolated to workers in their 20s.

The Truth about Global Warming stories

Remember this,

"The threat of environmental crisis will be the 'international disaster key' that will unlock the New World Order." [Mikhail Gorbachev, quoted in "A Special Report: The Wildlands Project Unleashes Its War On Mankind", by Marilyn Brannan, Associate Editor, Monetary & Economic Review, 1996, p. 5.]

Everyone knows the term New World Order alludes to a global centralised technocratic super government. Like the EU but global and even worse.

Now this is released.

A United Nations document on “climate change” that will be distributed to a major environmental conclave next week envisions a huge reordering of the world economy, likely involving trillions of dollars in wealth transfer, millions of job losses and gains, new taxes, industrial relocations, new tariffs and subsidies, and complicated payments for greenhouse gas abatement schemes and carbon taxes — all under the supervision of the world body.

This is the main thrust of the climate change scam. Pushing for a supranational legal framework, specifically designed to usurp the sovereignty of nation states but by proxy, the individual sovereignty of us all.

I add the following quotes for your consideration.

David Rockefeller Sept. 23, 1994 "This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long - We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."

Note the image on the right of the blog, of the newspaper.

"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." -David Rockefeller, from his own book, Memoirs.

We are moving toward a new world order, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.” — Mikhail Gorbachev 1987

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto determination practiced in past centuries"--David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991

"The invisible Money Power is working to control and enslave mankind. It financed Communism, Fascism, Marxism, Zionism, Socialism. All of these are directed to making the United States a member of a World Government ..." -- AMERICAN MERCURY MAGAZINE, December 1957, pg. 92.

"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits." — SIR JOSIAH STAMP, (President of the Bank of England in the 1920's, the second richest man in Britain)


“We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” — Statement made before the United States Senate on Feb. 7, 1950 by James Paul Warburg

"I am convinced that the agreement [Bretton Woods] will enthrone a world dictatorship of private finance more complete and terrible than a Hitlerite dream. It offers no solution of world problems, but quite blatantly sets up controls which will reduce the smaller nations to vassal states and make every government the mouthpiece and tool of International Finance. It will undermine and destroy the democratic institutions of this country - in fact as effectively as ever the Fascist forces could have done - and will undoubtedly present a new menace, endangering world peace. World collaboration of private financial interests can only mean mass unemployment, slavery, misery, degradation and financial destruction. -- Labor Minister of Australia, Eddie Ward, during the inception of the World Bank and Bretton Woods, he gave this warning.

All throughout history, tyrants have sought global domination. Our time is no different. The human race struggles against itself, seeking to drag itself away from these primitive insecurities, trying to quench them with never ending power and wealth. As far as Britain is concerned, people should educate themselves on a few things. The nature of money, how banks operate, and if you own yourself or if you are a slave to others. I will elaborate on this shortly.

Make no mistake, running serves no purpose whatsoever. We are born to fight for our freedom against parasites, and by God, this is what I shall do!

Geo-engineering Earth is ‘good idea’

Quack alert.

A UK Royal Society study has concluded that many engineering proposals to reduce the impact of climate change are "technically possible".

Such approaches could be effective, the authors said in their report.

But they also stressed that the potential of geo-engineering should not divert governments away from their efforts to reduce carbon emissions.

No, must keep up the tax on civilisation and reducing the quality of life for everyone on Earth, elite classes excluded of course.

Such engineering projects could either remove carbon dioxide or reflect the Sun's rays away from the planet.

Fucking hell, did I wake up in a parallel universe? You remove carbon dioxide and what are the plants going to use for photosynthesis? You reflect the Sun’s rays and what are the plants going to use for photosynthesis, you know the process that converts carbon dioxide into organic compounds, especially sugars, using the energy from sunlight.

Suggestions range from having giant mirrors in space, to erecting giant CO2 scrubbers that would "clean up" the air.

This is a typo, what they actually mean is erecting giant carbon tax scams that will suck the productivity out of the human race, something that seems to be alluded to in the next quote (my emphasis).

Of the two basic geo-engineering approaches, the report concluded that those involving the removal of carbon dioxide were preferable, as they effectively return the climate system closer to its pre-industrial state.

That one sentence sums up the entire environmental movement.

Of the carbon removal techniques assessed, three were considered to have most potential:

1. CO2 capture from ambient air: This would be the preferred method, as it effectively reverses the cause of climate change.

2. Enhanced weathering: This aims to enhance natural reactions of CO2 from the air with rocks and minerals. It was identified as a prospective longer-term option.

3. Land use and afforestation: The report found that land-use management could and should play a small but significant role in reducing the growth of atmospheric CO2 concentrations.

This is the best they can come up with? And think of the absurdity of humans trying to control the entire climate. What for? Climate is supposed to change, it is COMPLETELY NATURAL. But like I said, this isn’t about nature, this is about imposing a global regime using the environment as a pretext.

Professor John Shepherd, a researcher from the University of Southampton, chaired the Royal Society's geo-engineering study.

So you know who butters his bread.

He said: "It is an unpalatable truth that unless we can succeed in greatly reducing CO2 emissions, we are headed for a very uncomfortable and challenging climate future.

Horseshit you dip stick.

"Some geo-engineering techniques could have serious unintended and detrimental effects on many people and ecosystems, yet we are still failing to take the only action that will prevent us from having to rely on them.

If it involves reducing quality of life and/ or an ever increasing state to oppress the behaviour and industry of the human race, then it is far from unintended. Still, as far as he is concerned all of that is perfectly acceptable.

Long as it doesn’t involve him I’m sure.

"Geo-engineering and its consequences are the price we may have to pay for failure to act on climate change."

There is so much evidence (as in real world, not computer models) that completely rejects this so called man-made global warming cooling. Another thing, why do these state funded talking heads refer to climate change like it is something new? The climate has always changed and always will. But then I remember it isn’t about the scientific truth of anything, it is just about stirring up irrational responses, creating fear and advocating global governance and central control as the solution.

“The threat of environmental crisis will be the ‘international disaster key’ that will unlock the New World Order.” – Mikhail Gorbachev, quoted in “A Special Report: The Wildlands Project Unleashes Its War On Mankind”, by Marilyn Brannan, Associate Editor, Monetary & Economic Review, 1996, p. 5

And if you wonder what he meant by ‘new world order’;

“We are moving toward a new world order, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.” — Mikhail Gorbachev 1987

Also remember that they tried this shit in the 70’s and nature decided to prove them wrong.

This cooling has already killed hundreds of thousands of people. If it continues and no strong action is taken, it will cause world famine, world chaos and world war, and this could all come about before the year 2000. — Lowell Ponte “The Cooling”, 1976

If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder by the year 2000…This is about twice what it would take to put us in an ice age. — Kenneth E.F. Watt on air pollution and global cooling, Earth Day (1970)

Funny, I don’t have to ice stake to work. But I don’t have to swim there either.

Government to ban pint glasses

What a bunch of patronising cunts.

Plans to replace the traditional pint glass with one made of unbreakable plastic will not be accepted by drinkers, the pub industry has warned.

Damn right, who the fuck wants to pay the massively inflated costs of a pint these days, only to have it served in a piece of plastic. Let’s hear the excuse for this latest volley against freedom.

The Home Office has commissioned a new design, in an attempt to stop glasses being used as weapons.

Official figures show 5,500 people are attacked with glasses and bottles every year in England and Wales.

I'm sure I don't have to point out the absurdly low number of attacks this constitutes in the scheme of the number of pubs and revellers. More people die needlessly under the care of the NHS each year. There are over 7000 pubs in London alone. According to the same article;

126 million pints per week are served in the UK. Now that sounds high to me, but anyway.

126 million * 52 weeks = over 6 billion 500 million pints per year.

5,500 people are attacked each year with the evil pint glass. This amounts to a less than 0.00009 percent attack rate. This figure is so low I’ve convinced myself that I calculated the percentage wrong. Another way of looking at this is the average pub goer will have a 1 in 1,181,818 chance of this happening to them.

There is no logical reason for this whatsoever. What’s next, banning metal knives and forks?

Neil Williams from the association said he was concerned that drinkers would notice a drop in quality:

"For the drinker, the pint glass feels better, it has a nice weight and the drink coats the glass nicely. That's why people go out for a drink, to have a nice experience".

Something this fucking piss poor excuse for a government is doing its best to destroy using its favourite weapon; bureaucracy.

Mr Williams said the industry feared extra costs at a time when many pubs were struggling in the recession: "It would impose another cost on us. Red tape is already coming from all sides."

More costs, more regulations, more excuses for the government to watch and control private enterprise. Still, the Ministry of Freedom Home Office is adamant that us peasants accept the new programming. What to do?

Nick Verebelyi, the designer in charge of delivering the new pint, said they were looking at two approaches.

"One is to coat the glass with a substance that will make sure the glass doesn't shatter into pieces when it is broken - that could be a plastic material for example.

Whatever, I want my pint in a glass, not in some oestrogen leaking plastic container. By the way, do you know how easy it is to break a plastic pint, er cup? And what of the possibility of people using pint containers even more because ‘it’s just plastic’. I’ll lob this pint because it’s only plastic what’s the worst that can happen? Another big fucking waste of public funds.

Mr Verebelyi said he accepted that drinkers are attached to the traditional glass pint: "You make a change and there is often opposition, we've got to make it appealing to them.

"We've got to make it desirable and acceptable and cool.

"There's going to be quite a push behind this in terms of the Home Office."

Translation: We need to re-engineer people to think they way we want them to.

The Home Office Minister, Alan Campbell, said the redesign could make a significant difference to the number of revellers who are injured.

He said: "Innovative design has played an important role in driving down overall crime, including theft, fraud and burglary.

"This project will see those same skills applied to the dangerous and costly issue of alcohol-related crime and I am confident that it will lead to similar successes."

Bullshit. Note in the last sentence he says this should reduce alcohol related crime. But I thought this was about pint glasses in the face? Alcohol-related could mean any-fucking-thing, especially when the state has an agenda.

Hate speech in the Quran

When Islamic terrorists massacred 186 children and 148 other non-Muslims on the morning of September 3^rd, 2004 at a schoolhouse in Beslan, Russia, very few Muslims celebrated the high-profile event and some even took the time to denounce it.  But, in a community renowned for its peevishness, there was very little passion over the routine slaughter of innocents in the name of Islam.

While rumors of a Qur’an desecration or a Muhammad cartoon bring out deadly protests, riots, arson and effigy-burnings, the mass murder of non-Muslims generally evokes yawns. In the six years following 9/11 more than 10,000 acts of deadly Islamic terrorism were perpetrated, yet all of them together fail to provoke the sort of outrage on the part of most Muslims that the mere mention of Abu Ghraib or Guantanamo inspires.

This critical absence of moral perspective puzzles many Westerners, particularly those trying to reconcile this reality with the politically-correct assumption that Islam is like other religion.  The Judeo-Christian tradition preaches universal love and unselfishness, so it is expected that the more devout Muslims would be the most peaceful and least dangerous... provided that Islam is based on the same principles.

But beneath the rosy assurances from Muslim apologists that Islam is about peace and tolerance lies a much darker reality that better explains the violence and deeply-rooted indifference.  Quite simply, the Qur'an teaches hate.

READ THE REST OF THIS ARTICLE

How The West Was Lost

From James Delingpole, in the Telegraph Blog.

The Burkini. You’d think it was a joke invention: a bit like the grotesque “Mankini” so hilariously sported by Sacha Baron Cohen on all those posters for Borat. What, after all, could be more absurd than melding the not-notably-sexy Muslim dress - the Burka - with the kind of achingly seductive kit worn by Brigitte Bardot in And God Created Woman?

But no, the Burkini is for real. It was designed by an Lebanese Australian Aheda Zanetti to enable women in thrall to extreme Saudi-style dress codes to go swimming on beaches and in public baths without incurring a beating or instant divorce from their characteristically tolerant and cosmopolitan menfolk.

If you didn’t know, it is in regards to this cultural Jihad being waged by Muslims in Britain, in this case, by imposing dress codes and Muslim only swimming sessions.

What I will add however, is the real reason for Muslim only sessions is because Muslims believe that us non Muslims are ritually unclean. Every part of us is impure and they have to keep their distance lest they be infected by our disgusting non Muslim touch.

I’m not kidding. From ‘The Legacy of Jihad by Andrew G. Bostom, MD’ we have this quote on page 33;

… According to Al-Majilisi,

And, that they should not enter the pool while a Muslim is bathing at the public baths. . . . It is also incumbent upon Muslims that they should not accept from them victuals with which they had come into contact, such as distillates, which cannot be purified. If something can be purified, such as clothes, if they are dry, they can be accepted, they are clean. But if they (the dhimmis) had come into contact with those clothes in moisture they should be rinsed with water after being obtained.

It goes on. It is only when the study Islam for yourself that you begin to discover just how much contempt Islam and its followers view us and everything about us in the West (except the benefits and council houses, which is a form of financial Jihad). Talk of ‘social cohesion’ etc is all nonsense. Islam is an imperialistic, totalitarian socio-political supremacist sect, not a religion. They do not wish to integrate, they wish to infiltrate and then dominate, while assimilating the benefits of Western society and imposing their tyrannical collectivist death cult on the rest of us. They see themselves as superior to us in every way, not because they personally came to that conclusion, but because Islam states it, and they don’t think for themselves. Actually, they’re not allowed to think. Islam says so. Such is the nature of cults.

To make it perfectly clear, Islam is not a peaceful, passive system. It is an aggressive encroaching system. Depending on their relative numbers in a host state they may play the quiet card, slowly imposing their barbaric primitive culture or in larger numbers, outright violence and threats against local non Muslims. Anyone who tells you different is either a) ignorant or b) lying. From the same book as I quoted above (and the same page);

Sir Jadunath Sarkar, for example, a preeminent historian of Mughal India, wrote the following in 1920 regarding the impact of centuries of jihad and dhimmitude on the indigenous Hindus of the India subcontinent:

Islamic theology, therefore tells the true believer that his highest duty is to make “exertion (jihad) in the path of God,” by waging war against infidel lands (dar-ul-harb) till they become part of the realm of Islam (dar-ul-Islam) and their populations are converted into true believers. After conquest the entire infidel population becomes theoretically reduced to the status of slaves of the conquering army. The men taken are to be slain or sold into slavery and their wives and children reduced to servitude.

Religion of peace indeed.

If you want a grounding in Islam relatively quickly, look at the links on the right under ‘Islam’ and read this.

Forget National Sovereignty

“All your Rights Are Belong to Us” – EU

In 2001, when EU leaders gathered in Laeken, Belgium, to plan their next great leap forward to European integration – the ill-fated EU constitution – they also agreed on what they saw as another bold symbol of their wish to see Europe politically and legally united: the European Arrest Warrant. Fired by the recent 9/11 outrage, they agreed that the courts of any country could call on those of another to order the automatic extradition of anyone suspected of offences under 32 headings, with such crimes as terrorism, drug-running and “xenophobia” high on their list.

Even then, fears were expressed that such a summary shortcutting of normal legal procedures might lead to serious injustices. Not all of the EU’s judicial systems (to put it mildly) rest on the same ideas of justice. But even those most worried about the dangers of this system could scarcely have imagined a case like that involving the extradition to Greece of a 20-year old British student, Andrew Symeou.

I know people don’t seem to notice at this is happening, or even care for that matter (until it happens to you of course). Instead people seem happy to continually tip toe along ever thinning lines of ‘legal behaviour’. I say the line gets thinner, because the more laws they pass, the more things become illegal that were legal a week ago.

Think about that. An illegal act is supposed to be only that which is fundamentally wrong, a violation of an individuals’ freedom or property rights would constitute such an act. But now, with thousands upon thousands of laws and statues now being enforced, nobody has a clue what they really can or cannot do.

And that is just in our Parliament. The EU’s directive book hasn’t even been audited, no one really know how many there are, but visit the EU law website on any given day and you’ll see a bunch of new directives being passed. The official journal lists approximately 9 directives a day. Some add rules, some change old rules, but you haven’t got a clue about any of them do you?

This EU extradition rule is just a small glimmer of the supranational grasp of this tyrannical invention. People only seem to want to take notice when it rears its ugly head, but usually it is busy usurping our freedoms through Parliament in stealth.

I’ll write more about this later.

Women in Islam

There has been a fair bit of talk lately on this issue with the Burka, or Burkini or whatever. Recently it was banned in France (well done lads);

A French mother was banned from wearing the three-piece outfit at her local swimming pool.

Carole, a 35-year- old Muslim convert, was told it was ' inappropriate' on hygiene grounds, but she insists the ban is racial discrimination.

It follows French President Nicolas Sarkozy recently attacking Muslim burkhas as a 'sign of subservience' for women and saying they should be banned.

Racial discrimination. For a religious garment. Race and religion are two different things, so we already know the mental limitation of this female, I mean she converted to Islam so don’t expect any sort of intellect here.

Women have rights that are similar to men, but men are "a degree above them." 2:228

Pat Condell weighed in on the subject with typical clarity and humour, worth a watch.

Like Pat, I too am wondering where all the rabid feminists are on this subject. Harriet the Man Hater, all too happy to portray women as victims of their sex (while equal at the same time, go figure) hasn’t uttered a peep. I suppose Muslims must come before white women in her twisted cultural Marxist worldview. Feminists are social parasites and they make me sick.

A woman is worth one-half a man. 2:282

Now it is probably common knowledge now that the wearing of this Burka is not a requirement of Islam. More Muslim women seem to wear it in the West than they do in the Middle East, which just me think it is a form of Islamic cultural warfare. Doing their utmost to broadcast that they want to be different, see us as different and do not wish to communicate in the way we in the West have done for hundreds of years.

"All married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess." You can't have sex with married women, unless they are slaves obtained in war (with whom you may rape or do whatever you like). 4:24

There was a female Muslim convert on LBC the other day defending wearing the Burka, saying she joined Islam because it is ‘liberating and peaceful’. Dressing up like an out of shape ninja is liberating is it? She said she liked the ‘modesty’. So she wanted to dress modestly and joined Islam to do it? She couldn’t just, you know, DRESS MODESTLY?

Women are feeble and are unable to devise a plan. 4:98

She obviously has done ZERO research into Islam, preferring to just listen to local Muslims talk shit about it, themselves probably knowing next to nothing about it. Did you know the Islamic rule for leaving the religion is death, and they imposed this rule because they were worried many Muslims would leave Islam on Mohammed’s passing, after finding out the true hatred and violence ingrained in the religion?

Believing women must lower their gaze and be modest, cover themselves with veils, and not reveal themselves except to their husbands, relatives, children, and slaves. 24:31

Of course you didn’t. Like usual, people don’t do their own research anymore, being infantile and lazy (like the humans in Pixars’ Wall-E) choosing instead to base their worldly knowledge on sanitised nonsense drip fed to them via the corporate media and the state. View this strange article in the Telegraph;

Women are allowed in mosques but there are always separate rooms in which they pray.

The Koran doesn’t specifically say married couples should be separated at weddings, but it is a long-standing custom.

It is customary that the male and female guests are served separate wedding banquets and only at the end do the married couple sit together, sometimes under a headscarf while prayers are read.

This separation of sexes is part of the religion’s emphasis on chastity and modesty, which is also reflected in the way many Muslim women cover their faces and bodies in public.

Isn’t that sweet? Islam just wants its women to be chase and modest. Nothing to do with viewing women as inferior to men then. Nothing to do with women being seen as meat by Muslim men, interpretations of which lead to women being raped, and then found guilty of sex outside marriage! An example from Pakistan.

Hudood laws are a tool in the hands of men - with these laws they can rape women and be totally unaccountable.

Under Hudood if a woman makes a rape allegation she must provide four pious male witnesses or face a charge of adultery herself.

So a woman is in the ridiculous position of having to produce four Muslim adult male eyewitnesses, men who just stood there and watched.

If sex by force is not proved, this woman can be charged with "zina" - sex outside of marriage.

Uzma Saeed believes the Hudood ordinances should be repealed

About 60% of women in our jails have been imprisoned as a result of Hudood laws.

This Islamic rule was superseded by the Women Protection Bill in 2006, but that bill has come under attack for being un-Islamic.

The Religious political parties however are against the Bill calling it un-Islamic. They argue that the bill goes against articles 2a and 227 of the constitution of Pakistan, which state respectively that "Islam will be the state religion" and "No laws will be passed which are repugnant to the Koran and sunnah."

There is no doubt about it. Men and women are not equal under their God. Girls have been stoned to death for being raped, from November ‘08;

A 13-year-old girl who said she had been raped was stoned to death in Somalia after being accused of adultery by Islamic militants, a human rights group said.

Religion of Peace? Fuck off. There are a number of things you need to take into consideration if you want to formulate a thorough understanding about the true face of Islam.

1. The teachings of the Koran, Hadiths and Sunnahs, Shariah etc

2. What Mohammed himself did and said (remember he is the example of the perfect man to all Muslims, so they must agree and defend all of his actions).

3. What actually occurs in Islamic states around the world today.

4. What has occurred in Islamic states throughout history.

5. What is happening in Western states with mass immigration of Muslims.

Just listening to a few apologists on the corporate media or some ignorant Muslim is insufficient in building an honest understanding of this so-called Religion of Peace.

If you want a summary of the treatment of women under Islam from a technical perspective, start here;

Women’s Worth in Islam

And some more info on the ideology.

The Myths of Islam

Tamiflu and Swine Flu vaccine research

I hope you guys are paying attention to the latest wave of news regarding the negative effects of Tamiflu, and that is an ‘established’ antiviral.

Google News Listing

Remember the Swine Flu vaccine (which they are subtly demanding the whole world takes) has had no such ‘testing’. On top of that it (Relenza) contains the adjuvant AS03. This can be confirmed by the following page on the Glaxo website, which states;

The vaccine will comprise antigen of the recently isolated A (H1N1) influenza strain and also contain GSK's proprietary adjuvant system AS03.

AS03 contains Squalene plus Vitamin-E (Why?) plus Polysorbate-80 (Tween-80) which is another additive that crosses the blood-brain barrier and is thought to create adverse effects (it's in Gardasil).

Regarding squalene;

Your immune system recognizes squalene as an oil molecule native to your body. It is found throughout your nervous system and brain. In fact, you can consume squalene in olive oil and not only will your immune system recognize it, you will also reap the benefits of its antioxidant properties.

The difference between “good” and “bad” squalene is the route by which it enters your body. Injection is an abnormal route of entry which incites your immune system to attack all the squalene in your body, not just the vaccine adjuvant.

Your immune system will attempt to destroy the molecule wherever it finds it, including in places where it occurs naturally, and where it is vital to the health of your nervous system

Polysorbate-80 is known to cause infertility.

Polysorbate 80 (also known as tween 80) is a stabilizer used in a wide variety of products including ice cream, milk products, vitamin tablets, lotions and creams and medical products like vaccines and anti-cancer medications.

It is toxic and should not be eaten, drunk, put on the skin or injected.

According to Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Volume 95, Number 6, December 2005 , pp. 593-599(7), "it is of current relevance as a 'hidden' inductor of anaphylactoid reactions", and "Polysorbate 80 was identified as the causative agent for the anaphylactoid reaction of nonimmunologic origin in the patient. Conclusions: Polysorbate 80 is a ubiquitously used solubilizing agent that can cause severe nonimmunologic anaphylactoid reactions."

Put in plain English, polysorbate 80 can affect your immune system and cause severe anaphylactic shock which can kill.

It also goes by the name Tween 80 (Polysorbate 80) -- Polyoxyethylene Sorbitan Monooleate (polyoxyethylenesorbitan monooleat);

“Gardasil contains Polysorbate 80, which is linked to infertility in mice,” noted Dee Nicholson, National Communications Director for Freedom in Canadian Health Care. [Nov 2007] Sleight of Handling: More Merck Magic Tricks With HPV Vaccine By Christopher C. Barr

A study published in December, 2005 discovered that Tween80 can cause anaphylaxis, a sometimes fatal reaction characterized by a sharp drop in blood pressure, hives, and breathing difficulties. Researchers concluded that the severe reaction was not a typical allergic response characterized by the combination of IgE antibodies and the release of histamines; it was caused by a serious disruption that had occurred within the immune system. Exploring Vaccines

According to the World Intellectual Property Organization, which is part of the United Nations, scientists from the organization are developing vaccines specifically to damage fertility as a method of contraception. A suggested ingredient for the vaccine is tween 80 (polysorbate 80): “In a preferred embodiment the vaccine comprises oil, preferably a biodegradable oil such as squalene oil. Typically, the vaccine is prepared using an adjuvant concentrate which contains lecithin in squalene oil. The aqueous solution glycoprotein is typically a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution, and additionally preferably contains Tween 80.” (Fertility Impairing Vaccine And Methods of Use’ This application claims the benefit of U. S. Provisional Application No. 60/070,375, filed January 2,1998, U. S. Provisional Application No. 60/071,406, filed January 15,1998.) Exploring Vaccines

It also contains Thiomersal;

Thiomersal (INN) (C9H9HgNaO2S), or sodium ethylmercurithiosalicylate, commonly known in the United States as thimerosal, is an organomercury compound (approximately 49% mercury by weight) used as an antiseptic and antifungal agent.

No mercury or mercury derivative should ever enter your body, there is no safe quantity. Mercury itself is extremely toxic to living organisms;

The World Health Organization declared there is no safe level of mercury for human beings - in other words, mercury is so poisonous that no amount of mercury absorption is safe. (1992)

We now know Thiomersal is an organic mercury compound;

Compounds of mercury tend to be much more toxic than the element itself, and organic compounds of mercury are often extremely toxic and have been implicated in causing brain and liver damage. The most dangerous mercury compound, dimethylmercury, is so toxic that even a few microliters spilled on the skin, or even a latex glove, can cause death.

There is also a possible mass sterilisation vector to these vaccines, considering the toxic ingredients and the deliberate stoking up of fear by governments, supranational organisations (WHO) and the MSM. There is a long list of documented sterilisation via vaccine programmes.

Vaccines: Sterilisation & Abortion

Mercury, Autism and the Global Vaccine Agenda

Obama’s current ‘science czar’ John P. Holdren co-wrote a book called Ecoscience advocating mass global sterilisation programmes using vaccines, medicated tap water and other vectors. Another one of the books’ authors, Paul H. Erlick is another rabid depopulate the planet advocate.

I strongly recommend you check all of the links on this page, read through the respective articles and do you own additional research.

Think about it, if this is the information we can uncover about these vaccines, imagine what we don’t know, and even if you don’t believe everything on here (hence you should self-check) the mere fact that so much negative data exists regarding them should make you think twice with ‘just trusting the government, they know best’.

The final responsibility for your health and that of your children does not rest with the WHO or your government, they don’t love you or your family, you are merely a statistic to them. Would you trust that complete strangers will look out for you and your family with more love and attention than you would?

Of course not.

Britain has more CCTV than China

Britain has one and a half times as many surveillance cameras as communist China, despite having a fraction of its population, shocking figures reveal.

There are 4.2million closed circuit TV cameras here, one per every 14 people.

But in police state China, which has a population of 1.3billion, there are just 2.75million cameras, the equivalent of one for every 472,000 of its citizens.

Simon Davies from pressure group Privacy International said the astonishing statistic highlighted Britain's 'worrying obsession' with surveillance.

'Britain has established itself as the model state that the Chinese authorities would love to have,' he said.

'As far as surveillance goes, Britain has created the blueprint for the 21st century  non-democratic regime.

'It was not intended but it has certainly been the consequence.'

Oh, it was intended. Everything they are doing to destroy this beautiful country is intended. You don’t accidentally fall into a police state, or sign away the worlds most illustrious, ancient democracy in the world to a Nazi wet dream. While people, commentators, MP’s and media continue to make excuses for it, it will keep getting worse.

Denial is not a river in Egypt, it is a Road to Hell.

‘Secure’ ID card – cloned and altered in 12 minutes

Laurie is holding one of 51,000 ID cards issued by the Home Office to foreign nationals currently working or studying in Britain.

It is similar to the ID card for British citizens unveiled last week by Alan Johnson, the Home Secretary, as part of the Government's ongoing National Identity Scheme.

Embedded inside the card for foreigners is a microchip with the details of its bearer held in electronic form: name, date of birth, physical characteristics, fingerprints and so on, together with other information such as immigration status and whether the holder is entitled to State benefits.

This chip is the vital security measure that, so the Government believes, will make identity cards 'unforgeable'.

The same technology in the ‘new, improved’ Passports by the way.

But as I watch, Laurie picks up a mobile phone and, using just the handset and a laptop computer, electronically copies the ID card microchip and all its information in a matter of minutes.

He then creates a cloned card, and with a little help from another technology expert, he changes all the information the card contains - the physical details of the bearer, name, fingerprints and so on. And he doesn't stop there.

With a few more keystrokes on his computer, Laurie changes the cloned card so that whereas the original card holder was not entitled to benefits, the cloned chip now reads 'Entitled to benefits'.

As a chilling twist, he adds a message that would be visible to any police officer or security official who scanned the card: 'I am a terrorist - shoot on sight.'

I bet you didn’t know the ID card contains these sort of options, did you?

More disturbing still, it could be used to cover the tracks of terrorists planning atrocities on British or foreign soil. By any sensible measure, his demonstration, as part of a special Mail investigation, should be the final nail in the coffin of the Government's £5.4-billion ID scheme.

I doubt it. They are in bed with too many corporations with data mining contracts and are bound by the EU Laws concerning ID cards, which the government tries to deny. Also connected are the new Passports and EU Directive 95/46/EC.

There is also a bigger picture to this. In true Fabian fashion, nations all over the world are implementing centralised digital population registers, especially in the EU. (All nations being bound by EU Law). The issue is ownership. The government is essentially taking ownership of these (over) 50 points of data off of you, and imposing upon you the obligation to constantly update their database, else you risk a £1000 fine. For you own information. On their computers. On top of that, recently a Royal Courts of Justice ruling has set a disgustingly totalitarian precedent;

It would mean any civil/public servant and/or offices of the civil service could commit any act of wilful negligence without fear of legal action and with absolute impunity.

Imagine. A centralised collection of the most critical, important information that exists for you to interact with society. Forced together in one place (would you put your PIN with your credit card?) and that will be accessible by millions of civil servants, private businesses and even other countries.

On top of all that, is the inevitable lax in integrity-checking that is bound to occur with these new fangled super-duper ID cards. Incompetent (and unaccountable) civil servants will assume the technology is perfect, and not pay as much attention. Anyway, there is absolutely no reason why the government should assume central authority over such data. Unless it wants to position itself as the All-Seeing-Eye of all transactions.

Fuck the government. Put that in your fucking database you bunch of fascist cunts.

Harriet Harman reveals her utter contempt for men

Harriet Harman has expressed sympathy for female ministers who find it difficult “being a woman in a man’s world”, and insisted that men should not be left to run things on their own.

Ms Harman, Labour’s Deputy Leader and the Minister for Women and Equality, said that one of the party’s top two positions should always be held by a woman and that the party would never have a male leader and deputy again, as was the case with Tony Blair and John Prescott.

By the way, notice how they merge ‘women’ with ‘equality’, as if it can only be done with women*. This bitch has serious issues, hardly the kind of discriminating, incompetent hateful little cunt you’d want making policy, is it.

“Men cannot be left to run things on their own. I think it’s a thoroughly bad thing to have men-only leadership,” she added. Voters were fed up with “boys running the show”, she said. "In a country where women regard themselves as equal, they are not prepared to see men just running the show themselves. I think a balanced team of men and women makes better decisions.”

The difference between voters and this fucking twat is that we are more impressed with being competent, not being female. Nobody gives a fuck what colour or sex you are, so long as you do the fucking job properly. Balanced team? What does that mean then? So four incompetent women and four incompetent men make better decisions than one competent person? She also claims to know what ‘the voters’ think. Fuck off. These scumbags couldn’t care less what we think, so long as we continue to let them destroy the country for Socialism/ Communism.

Asked if she agreed with accusations by Caroline Flint, the former Europe minister, that Gordon Brown uses women ministers as window dressing, she replied: “I can always understand anyone’s frustration about being a woman in a man’s world.”

Flint, another useless fuckwit who only got the job because she’s female. Remember, this is the waste of space that was given the job of Europe Minister (whatever the hell that means) and during her whole tenure there, admitted she never read the Lisbon Treaty. So what the fuck was she there for, other than being another talking head for Brussels, and keeping another dumb bitch in the job to woo female voters?

Her comments today came as she defended her decision to reappoint a man — Trevor Phillips — to run the Equalities Commission, an organisation which she admitted was giving her “great concern”.

Yes he’s a man, but he’s also black. That’s the difference. For these Marxists there is a league table for victims. The same way the feminists of old tried to compare themselves to black people from the slave trade, in that whole ‘we are all victims of evil white male society’ etc. How these middle class tramps living in nice big (man-made) homes who lounged around gushing over the Communist Manifesto and never wanted for anything can suddenly believe they suffer like slaves is beyond me. But that is just how narcissistic these bitches are.

Let me get this straight. If you are male, Harman hates you. If you are white and male, she would happily push you to the bottom of society, hence her trying for things like 12 months paid maternity leave. She hates the nuclear family. In fact, if you compare the goals of communism with her attitudes, you would see they are essentially identical. From the nasty fucking moron who thinks Castro is a hero and was watched by M15 for communist sympathising. She is also a Fabian.

* The father of communism did say that “Anyone who knows anything of history knows that great social changes are impossible without feminine upheaval. Social progress can be measured exactly by the social position of the fair sex, the ugly ones included.”

Side effects for over half of children who take Tamiflu

Just what the doctor ordered…

The drug being used to fight swine flu can also produce stomach pain, diarrhoea and sleeping problems.

Researchers in two studies reported that many children found concentration difficult after taking the drug  -  which could affect their performance in school tests and exams.

The findings will cause deep concern among parents and raise the question of whether the powerful anti-viral should be handed out so widely when the vast majority of swine flu cases involve only a mild illness.

The new studies will increase concern over the potential side effects of Tamiflu  -  liver failure is one of those listed on the box.

It also emerged yesterday that Japan has advised its GPs not to give the drug to youngsters between 10 and 19 because of high rates of ' neuropsychiatric side effects' such as feeling confused and having bad dreams.

The first study, of 103 children at three London schools, showed that 53 per cent suffered side effects.

The most common were nausea (29 per cent), stomach pain or cramps (20 per cent) and problems sleeping (12 per cent).

These are just the initial reactions. There is no information about long-term effects.

Government chief Big Pharma salesman medical officer Sir Liam Donaldson said Tamiflu should still be given to children if they have established symptoms and there are no existing medical reasons not to prescribe the drug.

GPs are reporting increasing cases of suspected Tamiflu side effects. One told Pulse magazine: 'It's not the innocuous drug the public seem to think it is.'

The Department of Health said last night: 'The EU regulatory position remains that no causal association between Tamiflu (or Relenza) and an increase in neuropsychiatric events has been established.'

Who gives a fuck what the EU thinks. Comes down to what I spoke about in my previous post, infantilism, the monopoly of authority is now in the hands of supra-national organisations. You no longer decide if it is good for you or not, they do.

As always, do what you like, but if you don’t ask questions you deserve what you get.

Infantilism in the MSM

The Daily Fail begins the article like this:

Why celebrities are to blame for women risking their lives in sunbed salons to look tanned

Now, regardless of the idiocy of women literally cooking themselves in these stupid little places for vanity, just how are celebrities to blame?

Are these individuals in the public eye responsible for the behaviour of these people not in the public eye? Are these women capable of independent thought or are they mindless drones who have no personal responsibility over their own lives?

They have become a society of limp-wristed snivelling little pussies.

This is happening all the time in the media. With drug abuse, tanning booths, financial scams etc, criminal scumbags. It is always someone else’s fault. No one is willing to accept the consequences of their own actions, because guess what? The nanny state has done its best to remove responsibility from its cattle. Wouldn’t want them kicking out when it’s time to milk them now would they…

You see, breaking the connection between action and consequence means people can no longer develop the ability to perceive risk. This is already happening with cotton-wool children.

There is a deeper more sinister angle to this also. To control your own perception of reality though true interactions with it is power. You develop the ability to deal with life in your own way, you naturally become independent. The oppressive state HATES THIS. With this blame culture, along with the rampant Health and Safety quangocracy there is a constant gathering of this decision making power away from the individual into the state, the consequence being that people become ever more dependent on the state for safety from reality.

Consider the example of a parent who deliberately shields a child from the outside world, in order to remain his/ her only means of interacting with it. The parent becomes the gatekeeper of all decisions. Same thing is happening with the state.

Doesn’t sound quite so healthy now does it?

On an ever deeper level this imposed culture of refusing to acknowledge personal responsibility is also a consequence of the state wishing to utterly abolish private property rights, the most valuable and sacred of which is the property of your body and time. In the same why you cannot blame an automaton for the actions your programmed it with, people are being encouraged to accept that the state is the regulator of all thought and action, essentially taking ownership of your mind and body. For your protection of course.

The ownership of self is the absolute starting point of all freedoms. Without it you are not even a slave, you simply cease to exist as an individual, like an ant in a hive.

I guess this smudging of responsibility is something along the lines of ‘leading beyond authority’. Blaming beyond yourself you can call it.

Sheesh, how did the human race ever survive before the Socialists were excreted from the bowels of the human condition…

We Fucked UP!!!!! – UK Met Office

…But yesterday the weathermen officially admitted that their prediction of a 'barbecue summer' had been hopelessly wrong.

And the bad news for millions of holidaymakers, many of whom had opted to stay in Britain on the strength of the optimistic forecast, is that after a soggy July, August will be no better.

It was in April that the Met Office proclaimed the chances were 'odds-on for a barbecue summer'. Rather like Michael Fish in October 1987, after he mockingly dismissed claims that a hurricane was on its way, the aptly-renamed 'Wet Office' was forced to confess its shortcomings yesterday.

'Seasonal forecasting is still a new science,' it said in defence. 'It's something we are still building on.'

Fucking idiots. Can’t forecast weather a few months ahead so small are their datasets, knowledge of systems and processing power. Yet, these publicly funded quangos claim to know ‘beyond a doubt’ what the climate is going to do over periods of decades.

Kind of like that fearmongering of ‘global cooling’ that was all the rage in the late 70’s.

They got that completely fucking wrong too (or to put it another way, the climate decided to disagree with them).

Remember though, that all of the billions of dollars/ pounds of hard working peoples’ money that is being funnelled into these quango’s is not to warn you ‘for your safety’, but to scare you into submission.

Hotter or colder doesn’t make a difference, as long as you do what you’re fucking told.

Good serf, now fuck off and give us some taxes and stop asking questions.

Somebody buy Jeremy Clarkson a pint

It’s hard work criticising the dictator-traitor-in-chief.

Jeremy Clarkson has been given a 'ticking off' by a BBC boss after using the most offensive swear word to describe Gordon Brown in front of a studio audience.

The 49-year-old host's remarks come less than six months after he was forced to apologise for calling Mr Brown a 'one-eyed Scottish idiot' during an interview with Australian journalists.

Apologise for telling the truth? Only in this New Socialist Shithole.

On Wednesday, Clarkson is understood to have told fans: 'I get into trouble talking about Gordon Brown, he is a silly c***.'

Telling the truth again. Can’t have that on the Ministry of Truth.

One insider said Clarkson was always 'irreverent' and used colourful language during his warm-up. They also pointed out that his comments were made off-air and were part of the usual banter before the show.

Despite this, Miss Hadlow and Clarkson 'had it out' near the programme's green room, where the BBC boss made it clear she had been annoyed by his behaviour and that it was unacceptable.

Yes Grima Wormtongue, no one dare speak the truth about Saruman*.

It is quite simple. Mr Clarkson is correct, and Grima is a slimy little PC slave. No wonder people are turning off the ‘toob’ in droves.

 

* It is obvious that Gorgon Brown-Pants is an unthinking, much-blinking puppet. Sauron in this case would be the Dark Lord himself, Mandelson.