NaturalNewsRead the full article.
Most people are familiar with type-1 diabetes and type-2 diabetes, but did you know researchers have discovered a third type of diabetes? Type-3 diabetes, as they are calling it, affects people who are extra sensitive to electrical devices that emit "dirty" electricity.
Type-3 diabetics actually experience spikes in blood sugar and an increased heart rate when exposed to electrical pollution ("electropollution") from things like computers, televisions, cordless and mobile phones, and even compact fluorescent light bulbs.
Dr. Magda Havas, a PhD from Trent University in Canada, recently published the results of a study she conducted on the relationship between electromagnetic fields and diabetes in Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine. In it, she explains how she and her team came to discover this about why electropollution is so dangerous for many people.
Thursday, 10 June 2010
Electropollution can cause diabetes (type-3)
Wednesday, 2 June 2010
Secret society investigation revealed to European parliament
The results of longstanding research on a secret society were presented at the European Parliament on Tuesday by Daniel Estulin, author of the bestseller "The True Story of the Bilderberg Group."Secretive and elite – the Bilderberg group, which unites some of the world's most powerful people, has been meeting behind closed doors for decades.
Its activities have become shrouded in a mist of conspiracy theories, with some claiming its members are trying to create a new world order.
Investigative journalist Daniel Estulin has just revealed to the European Parliament all he claims to have discovered about the 'Bilderbergers'.
“Over almost 20 years of research I’ve found out that what today is called the Bilderberg group already existed over eight hundred years ago,” Estulin told RT. “Back then they were called the Venetian black nobility. Bilderberg is the creation of the Sinarchy movement who are very potentially founders and financiers of Hitler. As Sinarchy international they, in turn, were founded by the Free Mason esoteric secret society back in the 1770s, as a kind of a counter attack on the principals upon which the United States of America was built.”
“A lot of people speak of Bilderberg as a domain of conspiracy theories, and of course it’s not, it’s a historical fact,” Estulin stated. “A lot of people believe that Bilderberg is a one-world government or creating the new world order, especially people point out a speech made by George W. Bush made back in the 1990s about the creation of one world government. It’s actually not about that at all. It’s a meeting of people who represent a particular ideology. That ideology is of money.”
“So the idea is not to create one world government rather the creation of one world company limited to where financial concerns are far more powerful than any government on Earth,” the journalist added.
Secretive and elite – the Bilderberg group, which unites some of the world's most powerful people, has been meeting behind closed doors for decades.
Its activities have become shrouded in a mist of conspiracy theories, with some claiming its members are trying to create a new world order.
Investigative journalist Daniel Estulin has just revealed to the European Parliament all he claims to have discovered about the 'Bilderbergers'.
“Over almost 20 years of research I’ve found out that what today is called the Bilderberg group already existed over eight hundred years ago,” Estulin told RT. “Back then they were called the Venetian black nobility. Bilderberg is the creation of the Sinarchy movement who are very potentially founders and financiers of Hitler. As Sinarchy international they, in turn, were founded by the Free Mason esoteric secret society back in the 1770s, as a kind of a counter attack on the principals upon which the United States of America was built.”
“A lot of people speak of Bilderberg as a domain of conspiracy theories, and of course it’s not, it’s a historical fact,” Estulin stated. “A lot of people believe that Bilderberg is a one-world government or creating the new world order, especially people point out a speech made by George W. Bush made back in the 1990s about the creation of one world government. It’s actually not about that at all. It’s a meeting of people who represent a particular ideology. That ideology is of money.”
“So the idea is not to create one world government rather the creation of one world company limited to where financial concerns are far more powerful than any government on Earth,” the journalist added.
One of the main vehicles for this are the supranational unions, such as the EU and NAU. These enable the global directorship to impose rules and diktats with greater ease. No need to go forth and convince the numerous national governments to implement xyz. Simply pass it as the supranational level, local governments then impose them using their own legislation, doing their best to cover up the fact it came from beyond their borders.
The depopulation plan (Agenda 21 et al) is simply their desire to cut 'waste' from their farms. It also, by reducing numbers and exterting ever more control over individuals, serves to reduce the probability of rebellion. Another way of putting this is reducing the number of variables in the system to control the propensity for chaotic, unpredictable behaviour in the population.
They co-opt movements that a borne from such chaos and gently guide them out of harms way. Like seeding storms to break up potential tornadoes.
The cattle blink and then go back to being collateral for loans for private banks, reduce the cost of credit and encourage people to get into debt. Debt that cost nothing to produce but years of your labour (time and energy) to repay. Meanwhile governments, instead of printing money at 0% interest decide to borrow it from the private banks, and charge the cattle the difference and then some.
They moan about it a bit, but wait, X Factors on. Mooooo.
Luckily more and more cattle aren't being so easily distracted anymore. The chaos may have reached a critical point.
Monday, 24 May 2010
US govt silencing dissenting scientists on oil spill issue
Ian MacDonald, an oceanographer with Florida State University, who more than two weeks ago said the oil spill was likely five times as large as the 5,000 barrel-a-day estimate from the National Oceanic Atmospheric and Administration, said the agency is attacking scientists who challenged government estimates, while itself doing little to glean new information about the spill size.
“The scientific community in the Gulf of Mexico is fairly small ... and we've been very dedicated for a long time and not only is nobody listening to us in this, but it seems like they really want us to shut up,” MacDonald said. “It's very, very punitive and anybody who is doing this is getting attacked by NOAA.”
A NOAA spokesman did not address MacDonald's claims directly, but said that the agency's spill response includes scientists with key federal agencies as well as partners in the scientific community and the private sector.
80,000 barrels a day?
The stinging criticism comes amid debate about the size of the oil spill emanating from BP's Macondo well about 40 miles off the coast of Louisiana. An April 20 blowout in a well under 5,000 feet of water triggered the oil spill, destroyed the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, and killed 11 workers.
Some independent scientists have made estimates that sharply depart from NOAA's estimate, which equates to 210,000 gallons a day.
Based on various models, including measurements of satellite imagery of the surface slick and an analysis of wellhead video released by BP, some scientists estimate the volume of oil spilling from the well as 25,000 to 80,000 barrels a day.
Monday, 10 May 2010
Consent must be given, it is never assumed
So there I was, thinking about the logic of the title statement. If a door to a house is open, does that mean you have consent to enter it? If a car boot is open, does that automatically mean you can help yourself to whatever is in it?
Of course not. This is one of the foundational pillars of a private property based society (i.e, a free society). Consent must be given. Now it should come as no surprise that the ever growing state seems to think it is above this basic rule (although nobody gave them consent to it). This little fact on its own should convince any and everyone that a revolution is needed. In a democracy the consent of the majority can override that of the minority. The truth is, there is no majority or minority. These are collectivist conveniences. There are only individuals. Only in a totalitarian, Marxist-style system can anyone (or group) demand the stripping of private property from another. Perfect for the ‘abolish private property’ mantra of collectivist ideologies such as socialism, communism, feminism and environmentalism.
I am about to opt out of this NHS corporate data mining project, called Summary Care Records. I have to opt out, because apparently the state was already decided that I want to opt in. They didn’t ask me obviously. Just like they didn’t ask me about bailing out banks and charging me the bill (illegal), going to war in the Middle East (illegal) and so on.
Consent is important, so are ‘rights’. They, like sunlight from the sun, are consequences of ownership. Simply put, you only have rights (consent is one) over things you own (such as yourself). Things you don’t own you have no rights over.
Simple isn’t it.
I don’t have the legal right to give you consent to enter someone else’s home and start eating out their fridge, any more than I can’t give you consent to have sex with that girl over there.
This applies to absolutely everyone. No one is exempt. It is the Great Equaliser. Socialist constructs like The Human Rights Act are not only disruptive to this logic, it is illegal (I’ll deal with this in another post). We are all equal in our rights over our own property and equally powerless over anyone else’s. Society, (from the beggar all the way up to the government) is composed of individuals. ‘Government’ doesn’t exist as a real thing, it is a virtual object that describes a group of individuals, nothing more. As such, the government should have no rights to assume consent of your property (your medical data, your organs or whatever).
They can’t do this because they don’t own you, right? I mean, if they did then you would be a slave in every meaning of the word. If they owned you, they would be able take money directly out of your pay check before you even get it. They could fine you arbitrarily, stop you from gathering as free people and protesting, ignore you when you actively reject government proposals, sell your private data to corporations, shoot you in the head because you ‘don’t look right’, pass laws purely for the purpose of taking more of your money, call you all racists and bigots for asking questions about changes in your local area, they can even sign you up to legal contracts so foreigners can tell you how you live your life and charge you hundreds of billions while they do it and even give voting rights to people who aren’t British. They could take the currency you have to use as payment for the use of your property (body) for production (provision of goods and services) and deliberately devalue it. They could borrow money from private banks that charge interest and demand you pay it.
Wait a minute…
Wednesday, 5 May 2010
Overpopulation Is A Myth - Note To The 'Elitists'
Go Fuck Yourself.
Fucking eugenicists. You really think you have a 'right' to demand others starve to death because you're too fucking ignorant to understand the big picture of the human race? You sit in your apartments in built up areas and assume the whole world is covered in skyscrapers and 4x4's, when the vast majority of the Earth's surface is untouched.
The real reason these sick fucks (and you useful idiots) want the population culled (not your family naturally) is so they would be easier to control in their global totalitarian utopia they are currently trying to engineer.
You make me sick.
The millions of babies dying each year, and you really want to sit there and huff 'it's good for the human race?'
You evil fucking bastards. I guess it's easier to advocate the deaths of millions of innocent, helpless people than it is to turn to the bastards pushing all this. The same bastards that fund the universities in the States, set up the Federal Reserve, bought out the Bank of England, set up the European Union and who would funded and promoted Socialism, Communism, Feminism and Environmentalism.
All of which, conveniently call for the abolition of private property and total control by a unaccountable, political class. Transferring ownership of the entire fucking world to the organisations these scumbags invented out of thin air. Like the United Nations, as they recently tried to sell the 'man made global warming scam' as a need to have a world government.
Yeah pull the other one. If you tyrants weren't such fucking unoriginal wankers you may have gotten further. We know you want a third world war and there will be one, but not the way you're expecting it. Not us 'little people' against each other, but us against you.
People destroying their corrupt political systems, unravelling the fraud that is the money supply, taking apart the global corporations, syndicates and supra-national governments and realising it's just a prison in our minds. All we need to do is be the change we want to see.
So get it through your thick skulls, the human race is infinitely resourceful, the problem is not 'the little people' the problem is the global banking cartels, the legal systems and fiat currency systems they invented purely to strip people from their rightly earned wealth and keep the human race running on the hamster wheel.
You see, these bastards don't need money. They don't orchestrate boom and bust because they need more mansions. They PRINT THE FUCKING STUFF. They just need to take it away from you, so you stay dependent on their debt and their 'charity'. Aren't they nice, they pay for your colleges and set your curriculums. They tell you want to think and how to act.
No wonder you fucking fake-liberals don't have a clue what is going on. Those million babies dying in filth aren't the enemy or a threat to the beauty and potential of the human race.
YOU ARE. You evil selfish egotistical cunts.
A billion abortions since 1920.
When you're laying in your bed, probably nice and fluffly with state-funded quango credits, think about thousands dying each day because of the policy papers, political manipulation and corporate fascism of your idols.
I hope you don't wake up.
Now THAT would really help the human race.
The elections barely mean anything. The pressure against the growing totalitarianism, the lies and the corruption won't stop because serfs tick boxes. It will only stop when the state is dragged down to size and does what the People want.
So don't feel down. Times are a' changin'.
U.S. attempting GLOBAL CENSORSHIP of GMO food labeling
(NaturalNews) I received an urgent alert from Jeffrey Smith today about a dangerous situation taking place right now at the international CODEX conference. The U.S. is attempting to push its agenda to censor all GMO labeling of foods everywhere around the world. This would result in a global GMO cover-up as consumers are left in the dark about whether their foods and grocery products are genetically modified or not.
For background on CODEX, read here.
READ THE FULL ARTICLEYour help is urgently needed to send a message to the Secretaries of State (Clinton), Agriculture (Vilsack), and Health and Human Services (Sebelius) to urge them to halt the USA's nefarious attempts to install a global GMO deception.
Take part in this online petition, go here:
http://www.seedsofdeception.com/GMF...
Please understand that the U.S. is attempting to outlaw non-GMO labeling of foods, thereby making it illegal for a non-GMO food product to even claim "non-GMO" on the label. If the U.S. succeeds in this global GMO cover-up, the FDA could seize any products in the USA that make "non-GMO" claims. Additionally, the USA could file lawsuits through the World Trade Organization against any country that allows non-GMO labeling or claims on its products.
Monday, 26 April 2010
May 20 Everybody Draw muhammad Day
The paintbrush/pen/pencil/crayon is mightier than the sword. Or hey, even needlepoint if you're up for it. The possibilities are endless. "Seattle cartoonist launches 'Everybody Draw Mohammed Day'," by Jamie Griswold for the Associated Press, April 23 (thanks to all who sent this in):
After Comedy Central cut a portion of a South Park episode following a death threat from a radical Muslim group, Seattle cartoonist Molly Norris wanted to counter the fear. She has declared May 20th "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day."
Norris told KIRO Radio's Dave Ross that cartoonists are meant to challenge the lines of political correctness. "That's a cartoonist's job, to be non-PC."
Producers of South Park said Thursday that Comedy Central removed a speech about intimidation and fear from their show after a radical Muslim group warned that they could be killed for insulting the Prophet Muhammad.
The group said it wasn't threatening South Park producers Trey Parker and Matt Stone, but it included a gruesome picture of Theo Van Gogh, a Dutch filmmaker killed by a Muslim extremist in 2004, and said the producers could meet the same fate. The website posted the addresses of Comedy Central's New York office and the California production studio where South Park is made.
"As a cartoonist I just felt so much passion about what had happened I wanted to kind of counter Comedy Central's message they sent about feeling afraid," Norris said.
Norris has asked other artists to submit drawings of any religious figure to be posted as part of Citizens Against Citizens Against Humor (CACAH) on May 20th.
But drawings of one "religious figure" in particular will provoke death threats and accusations of hatred and racism.
On her website Norris explains this is not meant to disrespect any religion, but rather meant to protect people's right to express themselves.
Wednesday, 21 April 2010
Invisible Empire - Full documentary
Jason Bermas presents Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined produced by Alex Jones.
View the video on Youtube here.
Friday, 26 March 2010
EUISS and World Governance: We Need Immigration and Climate Change As Arguments for Military World State Control
Summary: The EU Institute for Security Studies (EUISS) is the brain behind the EU's military. It is centered around Bilderberger and Club of Rome member, Javier Solana, former NATO Secretary General and EU foreign minister (High Representative). EUISS' annual publication 2009: "What ambitions for European defence in 2020", contains interesting information: Swedish Tomas Ries writes that the ISS needs a European army to defend EU borders against massive poverty immigration. He calls it distasteful and immoral - but necessary!
Furthermore, Ries writes that Europe needs to be able to wage war against countries (including Russia) with other views on the world than the EU's New World Order views. Furthermore, this New World Order will usurp the right of deciding to occupy an area of a former sovereign state in the name of, e.g. climate or biodiversity! Nevertheless, the EU has started to fulfill its promise of free movement within the EU for Muslim Euro-Mediterranean partners, as promised in 2003.
Furthermore, the EU has set up recruiting offices in Africa to recruit 56 million. Muslims + their families into the EU by 2050! At the same time, the EUISS writes in the report from its annual congress 2009, "Soft power". Managing a Post-crisis World", that it would be wrong to bar the Union from the outside world, because it is contrary to the sacred dogma of "unity in diversity." But then comes the strange thing: It is stated, that there is no risk of confrontation between the great powers - for they are partners. Why else does the European Union want an army, then?
Regionalization, it is said, is part of global governance. The Global Agenda (21) is generated by the linkage of the fight against the crises (climate, financial, immigration, development) - that the elite behind the New World Order has created itself for this very purpose. The G20 must be strengthened - and bought NGOs must have much more to say in support of the New World Order program - because this is New World Order "legitimacy". Better is soft power - but make no mistake. The EU will put hard power behind if it does not succeed by soft means. The British Defence Ministry wrote that everybody must be linked to a verifiable network (chips, among others) - and it will be deemed suspicious to stay outside. It stipulated that it will be difficult for those who want to preserve their indigenous culture and beliefs. They will be considered radicalised - while this is obviously not true, for example of Muslim "neo-Europeans". The UN has started to realize John F. Kennedy 's proposal from 1961 to abolish all armies and only maintain a UN world army of 50,000 men to oppress troublemakers against the New World Order. The NATO has usurped this role in 2008.
Thursday, 18 March 2010
Call for Civil Disobedience - a worldwide strike by the oppressed
The blogosphere and meeting places have been alight with anger, outrage, frustration. And questions about how to defeat our tyrannical 'masters' that make our lives a living hell.
Gandhi found non-compliance to be an effective tool to defeat his masters. And he was just one man.Imagine what we could achieve, if we made a concerted effort, for a given number of days.
The fact is, the corporations want our money. The government needs our money. The 'mainstream' media are the mouthpieces of these monsters. And all of them are the cause of our misery.
If we starve them of it for a spell, how would that affect them?We've lost the ability to think for ourselves because we've been programmed not to. If we cease to tune into their propaganda and instead, explore the alternative media, we see a different picture from the one they want us to see. We think for ourselves and join up the dots.
We have been little short of terrorised by their scare stories, their unwarranted use of and threat of force, their fines, their toxic products, their lies - to do their dirty bidding. They enrich themselves at our expense. Every time.
The Greeks and the Icelanders have woken up and taken action. The tyranny we face is on a par with theirs, if not greater, and yet we do bugger all about it. Our MPs don't give a jot - they're not listening to us. They're listening to their party whips, as they eye that juicy job within their grasp if they ignore us. So they do.
So let's learn from the Greeks, the Icelanders, Gandhi - and make our 'strike' international. After all, the entire civilised world is facing tyranny simultaneously.
And as Old Holborn says, we outnumber them. They cannot afford non-compliance on such a massive scale. Success frequently starts from small beginnings, as American patriots will tell you. As Gandhi demonstrated.
Visit the original post on Fausty Writes for full info and updates. I’m going to do this. It is time WE actually started doing things as opposed to just writing about these globalist bastards.
It is to occur April 15-18.
Friday, 12 March 2010
LSD as U.S. Military weapon
TELEGRAPH
For decades it was assumed that the local bread had been unwittingly poisoned with a psychedelic mould. Now, however, an American investigative journalist has uncovered evidence suggesting the CIA peppered local food with the hallucinogenic drug LSD as part of a mind control experiment at the height of the Cold War.
The mystery of Le Pain Maudit (Cursed Bread) still haunts the inhabitants of Pont-Saint-Esprit, in the Gard, southeast France.
On August 16, 1951, the inhabitants were suddenly racked with frightful hallucinations of terrifying beasts and fire.
One man tried to drown himself, screaming that his belly was being eaten by snakes. An 11-year-old tried to strangle his grandmother. Another man shouted: "I am a plane", before jumping out of a second-floor window, breaking his legs. He then got up and carried on for 50 yards. Another saw his heart escaping through his feet and begged a doctor to put it back. Many were taken to the local asylum in strait jackets.
Time magazine wrote at the time: "Among the stricken, delirium rose: patients thrashed wildly on their beds, screaming that red flowers were blossoming from their bodies, that their heads had turned to molten lead."
Eventually, it was determined that the best-known local baker had unwittingly contaminated his flour with ergot, a hallucinogenic mould that infects rye grain. Another theory was the bread had been poisoned with organic mercury.
However, H P Albarelli Jr., an investigative journalist, claims the outbreak resulted from a covert experiment directed by the CIA and the US Army's top-secret Special Operations Division (SOD) at Fort Detrick, Maryland.
The scientists who produced both alternative explanations, he writes, worked for the Swiss-based Sandoz Pharmaceutical Company, which was then secretly supplying both the Army and CIA with LSD.
Mr Albarelli came across CIA documents while investigating the suspicious suicide of Frank Olson, a biochemist working for the SOD who fell from a 13th floor window two years after the Cursed Bread incident. One note transcribes a conversation between a CIA agent and a Sandoz official who mentions the "secret of Pont-Saint-Esprit" and explains that it was not "at all" caused by mould but by diethylamide, the D in LSD.
While compiling his book, A Terrible Mistake: The Murder of Frank Olson and the CIA's Secret Cold War Experiments, Mr Albarelli spoke to former colleagues of Mr Olson, two of whom told him that the Pont-Saint-Esprit incident was part of a mind control experiment run by the CIA and US army.
After the Korean War the Americans launched a vast research programme into the mental manipulation of prisoners and enemy troops.
Scientists at Fort Detrick told him that agents had sprayed LSD into the air and also contaminated "local foot products".
Mr Albarelli said the real "smoking gun" was a White House document sent to members of the Rockefeller Commission formed in 1975 to investigate CIA abuses. It contained the names of a number of French nationals who had been secretly employed by the CIA and made direct reference to the "Pont St. Esprit incident." In its quest to research LSD as an offensive weapon, Mr Albarelli claims, the US army also drugged over 5,700 unwitting American servicemen between 1953 and 1965.
None of his sources would indicate whether the French secret services were aware of the alleged operation. According to US news reports, French intelligence chiefs have demanded the CIA explain itself following the book's revelations. French intelligence officially denies this.
Locals in Pont-Saint-Esprit still want to know why they were hit by such apocalyptic scenes. "At the time people brought up the theory of an experiment aimed at controlling a popular revolt," said Charles Granjoh, 71.
"I almost kicked the bucket," he told the weekly French magazine Les Inrockuptibles. "I'd like to know why."
Vietnam springs to mind. There is no end to accounts of government sponsored experimentation on civilians without their consent. A larger list is here, and here is an experiment done in Britain.
GUARDIAN
Wiltshire, Hampshire, Berkshire, Dorset, Somerset and Surrey were the main areas for the trials conducted from the chemical and biological warfare establishment at Porton Down, Wiltshire. The trials are now the subject of an official inquiry by an independent scientist.
Friday, 5 March 2010
Woman not responsible for her own actions, boyfriend is.
A controlling boyfriend who forced his bank manager partner to steal almost £1million, which he blew on exotic holidays and fast cars was jailed for three years today.
Crack addict Keith 'Junior' Preddie, 30, banked more than £145,000 of the stolen cash and spent more on powerful motorbikes, BMWs, a failed business and trips abroad.
Ania Wadsworth, 28, said Preddie threatened, beat and intimidated her in to stealing so he could pay off his spiraling drug debts and fund an 'extremely extravagant lifestyle'.
I guess going to the police was too empowering for her or something.
She repeatedly walked out of a branch of Lloyds TSB with bundles of £25,000 in her handbag and manipulated internal accounts to fool auditors.
Wadsworth admitted stealing the cash, but said she was a victim of 'battered woman syndrome' and Preddie had threatened to kill her if she did not hand over her wages and steal cash when he demanded.
Is there a battered man syndrome?
Wadsworth who had been a manager for five years, was unanimously cleared of theft after a three week-trial at the Old Bailey in January.
But Preddie, who bragged he was a high-flying record producer, was found guilty of money laundering.
He rocked back on his heels and needed support from dock officers as the sentence was announced. He was then led to the cells in tears.
Jailing him, Judge Richard Hone QC said: 'There can be no doubt that it was you who put Ania Wadsworth under pressure sufficiently and persistently to steal nearly £1million from Lloyds bank over a period of approximately five years.
Five years of this! She didn’t seek help so she couldn’t have been that bothered. This article continues with the most gynocentric shit I’ve seen in a long time.
Wadsworth said she was beaten and dominated by Preddie, adding: 'He basically said there were people that were going to kill him so he had to pay them and if I didn't get money for him then he would kill me.'
But jobless Preddie, who admitted having a £500-a-day crack cocaine habit, said he had spent only what he had been given as 'gifts'.
Any evidence for these beatings and threats? Otherwise it’s just hear-say, unless of course, a woman’s word is worth more than a man in the court. Note the next few clippings.
Wadsworth denied ever enjoying the trappings of wealth and said she rarely spoiled herself.
Bullshit.
For his 21st birthday in 2000, Wadsworth flew both of them to New York.
The couple then went on a string of holidays to Greece, the Canary Islands, Amsterdam and New York, all funded by her. She also had trips to Rome, Venice and Cyprus.
The couple also put a new kitchen and bathroom in their flat in Crouch Hill, north London, and he poured thousands in to a fledgling record company which never got off the ground.
No trappings of wealth there. There is a possible motive for her actions though…
He also holidayed in Jamaica with friends and the Dominican Republic with a woman called Jade, who he started seeing behind Wadsworth's back.
Preddie then squirreled away thousands so that he could start a new life with his lover, who he wined and dined with Wadsworth's money.
Ouch. Date a bad-boy, get treated like shit, go along for the ride, claim a complete and utter lack of personal responsibility when it suits her and dump everything on the man. Funny, I thought feminism was about men and women being ‘completely equal’. I guess only when it’s expedient for them, then they can use the poor innocent female card.
Now that’s what I call equality.
Monday, 22 February 2010
Government thinks British people opposed to cultural Marxism are ‘racist’
A previously unseen joint Cabinet Office and Home Office report called for increases in foreign workers to meet the Government's 'economic and social objectives'.
But it also stated that the public would be opposed to the shift because of 'racism' and urged ministers to try to alter public attitudes towards immigrants.
The document, which was written in July 2000 and released under the Freedom of Information Act, outlined plans for a step change in the number of both high and low skilled migrants.
But the authors warned: 'Policy development is constrained by public opinion and the current tone of public debate.'
'It is correct that public opinion favours relatively restrictive policies on immigration.'
Sections advising ministers to adopt a 'clear strategy for public opinion and public debate' to change views were removed from the published version.
Critics said the document showed ministers 'deliberately rode roughshod' over the public.
There was outrage last year after Andrew Neather, a former Labour speechwriter, revealed in a newspaper column that the loosening of controls in the early 2000s was part of a deliberate political agenda.
The 'immigration boom' of the last decade was engineered in part to change society by making it more multicultural, he said.
Just so people realise, this isn’t government policy dictated by the British people, this is government policy dictated at the British people and they choose to label the British with a politically manipulated phrase like ‘racism’. Surprised they didn’t call us terrorists…
A country doesn’t belong to the world, it belongs to its people, like your home belongs to you and not to the latest shipment of Somalian rapists and drug dealers. Sovereignty of a nation is an extension of the individual sovereignty of its people. To attack that is to attack the individual.
The government has been at a state of war with the British people for decades.
Sunday, 14 February 2010
Professor Phil Jones: No global warming since 1995
Professor Jones told the BBC yesterday there was truth in the observations of colleagues that he lacked organisational skills, that his office was swamped with piles of paper and that his record keeping is ‘not as good as it should be’.
The data is crucial to the famous ‘hockey stick graph’ used by climate change advocates to support the theory.
Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.
And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.
The admissions will be seized on by sceptics as fresh evidence that there are serious flaws at the heart of the science of climate change and the orthodoxy that recent rises in temperature are largely man-made.
Saturday, 16 January 2010
British Government Launches Crusade Against Free Speech - Calls for Mass Censorship of Media
Please take the time to read the PDF report linked below.
I have frequently pointed out how the British mainstream media either ignores incidences of muslim violence and/or hate crimes or obfuscates the identities of the muslim perpetrators. Here is a report that clarifies why the media has been so dhimmified and why the indigenous white British are continutally attacked and 'named and shamed' - even when undeserved - whilst the muslim and other minority criminals get a 'pass'. Muslims and other minorities are constantly portrayed as the overwhelmingly the victims even when the facts state that half of all victims of racially motivated murders in the last decade have been white.
The below is further evidence that the media is voluntarily complicit with the LaBour govenment's demands to hide how rampant illegal and legal immigration coupled with multiculturalism, political correctness and the myth of Islamophobia has grossly harmed Great Britain and its culture and freedoms.
"We are not content with negative obedience, nor even with the most abject submission. When finally you surrender to us, it must be of your own free will. We do not destroy the heretic because he resists us; so long as he resists us we never destroy him. We convert him, we capture his inner mind, we reshape him. We burn all evil and all illusion out of him; we bring him over to our side, not in appearance, but genuinely, heart and soul. We make him one of ourselves before we kill him. It is intolerable to us that an erroneous thought should exist anywhere in the world, however secret and powerless it may be. Even in the instance of death we cannot permit any deviation . . . we make the brain perfect before we blow it out." 1984 - George Orwell
The question looms -will the British people fight back against this latest attack on their freedoms and Country?
The British government published a new set of guidelines for newspapers calling for a voluntary ban on certain words and the suppression of stories about non-white crimes! While the guidelines are not a legal requirement, Britain has already prosecuted political figures for so-called “hate speech” for speaking out against Islamic immigration.
This Draconian document, published by unelected government bureaucrats, can be viewed here in PDF form. Click Here.
The guidelines call on newspapers and media to voluntarily cease using the following words:
“immigrant,” “illegal immigrant,” “illegal asylum seeker,” “bogus asylum seeker,” “non-white,” “non-Christian,” “mixed race,” “half-caste,” “mulatto.”
Never identify people by race or religion.
The media is told to give racial minorities preferential treatment in hiring to have a more “multi-racial” staff.
The media is told to portray ethnic minorities in a more positive light.
When discussing public opinion always use or include quotes from ethnic minorities.
Pander to the taboos of ethnic minorities. Learn what local ethnic minorities don’t like and then omit these things from your paper.
Encourage whites to embrace elements of 3rd world immigrant cultures. Promote and glorify the holidays, customs, and religious beliefs of non-white immigrant cultures.
Also expose “racists.”
The government document explicitly tells those in the media to portray minorities in a more positive light while holding white “racists” up to ridicule.
Friday, 15 January 2010
Top Obama czar: Infiltrate all 'conspiracy theorists'
By Aaron Klein
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
In a lengthy academic paper, President Obama's regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, argued the U.S. government should ban "conspiracy theorizing."
Among the beliefs Sunstein would ban is advocating that the theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud.
Sunstein also recommended the government send agents to infiltrate "extremists who supply conspiracy theories" to disrupt the efforts of the "extremists" to propagate their theories.
In a 2008 Harvard law paper, "Conspiracy Theories," Sunstein and co-author Adrian Vermeule, a Harvard law professor, ask, "What can government do about conspiracy theories?"
Thursday, 14 January 2010
Climate Change hysteria through the ages
You put the temperature up, put the temperature down, in out up down shake it all about, you do the hoke-coke and you give us all your taxes, that's what it's all about!
Past Climate Change Beliefs
Sunday, 10 January 2010
The mini ice age starts here - Mail
The bitter winter afflicting much of the Northern Hemisphere is only the start of a global trend towards cooler weather that is likely to last for 20 or 30 years, say some of the world’s most eminent climate scientists.As you probably know by now, Copenhagen was about centralising global property rights in the hands of global finance and their proxies (UN, etc). Carbon taxes is just a side effect of this.
Their predictions – based on an analysis of natural cycles in water temperatures in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans – challenge some of the global warming orthodoxy’s most deeply cherished beliefs, such as the claim that the North Pole will be free of ice in summer by 2013.
According to the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre in Colorado, Arctic summer sea ice has increased by 409,000 square miles, or 26 per cent, since 2007 – and even the most committed global warming activists do not dispute this.
Tuesday, 22 December 2009
US Swine Flu Spray Plane Shot Down In China
Monday, 30 November 2009
Ten Years On: Britain Without the European Union
I started making notes to post quotes, but I would end up typing up 50% of the book. Going through numbers, billions of pounds here, billions there, just flowing out the pockets of the People of Britain, people who earn it through sweat and toil, only to be pissed away on greasing the palms of poor countries and buying off politicians, setting up quangos and throwing money at media to promote the 'correct way of thinking about the EU', usual behaviour of a corrupt regime.
Do not think about the fact that individual freedom is the blood cell of a healthy, free society, and that the EU is the opposite of that. Putting aside the corrupt money flows, whereby the accounts of the EU haven't been signed off for 15 years or more, or the historical connection between the EEC cum EU and the Nazi 'Fourth Reich' plan, or the complete lack of democratic accountability and the blatant and consistent disregard for you view or the consequences of their decisions upon your life. Just put aside the 100,000+ pages of rules and diktats the EU has created to 'regulate' your life ad infinitum, even though simple logic would dictate that the more laws you have, the less free you are, seeing as rules and laws cannot add to freedom (freedom is an absence of law). Think about that, (in gross payments) we have been forced (because we didn't consent) into giving the EU approx a quarter of a trillion pounds of YOUR money, so you can be told what you can or cannot do, lest you be forced to pay them even more. The benefits of the EU are?
In every decision in life, whether you realise it or not, you carry out a risk-benefit assessment. Is going up to that girl at the bar worth the potential date later? The cost of that van worth the potential extra business? Think about how the EU benefits you. Forget their waffle, the expensive leaflets and propaganda. Try and think how paying the EU over £12,300 per minute, 24/7 year in, year out, benefits you. Compare it to how much you think it would benefit you by not paying it, and by not being told what to do.
I did say the book was short, I read it in a matter of hours without hardly trying. Unfortunately most people under the age of 18 can't read, but for those who can, get a copy.
I have picked a quote from the book, I think this sums up the EU nicely.
"Britain is paying a premium to belong to a gym that beats it up" - Ten Years On, pg 73 (Paraphrased)They have been pummeling the Great British Bulldog for decades, trying to push us down to the level of lower nations, in true global communist fashion. Drugging it with media and celebrity nonsense, smoke and mirrors with the corrupted Parliament, sucking out its life blood, shutting down production, stripping away ancient freedoms and so on. Just trying to weaken this Animal of Freedom so they can get close enough to skin it, and harvest its organs.
But guess what. Britain is still here. Everybody I know is pissed off with the government. All it takes it explaining to people what is going on so they can connect the dots, and that is beginning to happen.
Indeed, I think that Bulldog is beginning to stir. Its ear flicked and it has opened an eye. It can see that it is surrounded by enemies, red, blue and green feathers on yellow bodies, circling like vultures, all wanting a piece of the Prize Pooch. The oldest and most illustrious of democracies.
Once it is full awake, it is game over for these spineless, slithering snakes.
2010 is going to be very interesting.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(64)
-
▼
June
(6)
- Foreign Aid being re-routed to UK unions and indoc...
- THIS is why the public sector needs a massive cull
- WHO to tax your internet usage to fund vaccines in...
- Electropollution can cause diabetes (type-3)
- White people banned from applying for council posi...
- Secret society investigation revealed to European ...
-
▼
June
(6)