Foreign Aid being re-routed to UK unions and indoctrination programmes

David Cameron is facing growing criticism of his move to shelter the international aid budget from cuts after it was revealed that it diverts millions of pounds to trade unions and controversial projects in the UK.

International Development is one of just two Whitehall departments – the other is Health – ring-fenced from the swingeing 25  per cent spending cuts announced by Chancellor George Osborne last week.

But critics are increasingly questioning whether its £6 billion-a-year budget should be spared – while Departments such as the Home Office could be forced to sack 35,000 police officers in the £113 billion deficit reduction package.

Research has found that, since 2003, the Department for International Development (DFID) has spent millions on projects including:

• £3.6  million to the Trades Union Congress.
• More than £1 million to teach nursery and primary school children in the UK about the ‘dangers of unequal global development’.
• £600,000 to an ethnic minority think-tank which has not published a report for almost three years.
• £300,000 to the National Union of Teachers to ‘enable them to become global agents of change’.

Last night, the Conservatives said DFID’s immunity from the cuts would remain – but a ‘full value-for-money review’ of its spending was promised.

The Prime Minister’s Election pledge to protect the health and overseas aid budgets was designed to neutralise Labour claims that the Tories would hit frontline services.

But it means the burden of Mr Osborne’s move to cut Whitehall by a quarter over four years will fall on Transport and the Home Office – which face cuts of up to 33 per cent as a result.

The policy came despite a pre-Election audit of the DFID, which identified £800 million of annual spending with dubious merit – including £35 million in aid to corrupt Uganda and an astonishing £825 million to nuclear-armed India over the three years from 2009.

The EU also receives £1 billion a year from the department to distribute to developing countries.

Now, research by the International Policy Network (IPN) think-tank has identified where much of DFID’s money goes in this country.

Since 2003, £3.6 million has been given to the TUC, including a £2.4 million handout in 2009 for ‘advocacy and lobbying work’ and ‘to build support for development in the United Kingdom’.

Of this, £756,000 went on a ‘Strategic Framework Partnership Agreement’ – to fund training for the TUC to learn how to apply for further DFID grants.

The department also found £600,000 to set up a UK think-tank called Connections For Development, which aims to ‘provide a forum for black and ethnic minority organisations on issues relating to international development’.

And much more. Fucking corrupt shit.

Demo for democracy Saturday, for real change!

Demo for democracy Saturday, for real change!

by Sunny H
May 6, 2010 at 2:38 pm

Although the outcome of the election is still uncertain, one thing’s for sure: our voting system will deliver an arbitrary and unfair outcome and we will have a parliament which does not reflect what people voted for.

It is therefore highly likely that lots of people, many of them young people who have become involved in politics for the first time, will be angry and disillusioned and looking for change.

We are organising, along the rest of the democracy movement (Unlock Democracy/Charter 88, Power2010, Vote for a Change, Avaaz, 38 degrees, Compass etc) a rally and protest for the afternoon of Saturday May 8th at 2pm in Trafalgar Square.

The unions, the green movement and other sectors are also involved so it has the potential to be a large mobilisation and with the viral power of the web could be even bigger.

Party activists (once they have recovered!) will also be showing out we hope. We are asking people to wear purple – the colour of the franchise.

If necessary, we’ll gather again outside Parliament on the 15th.

We will be gathering to demand reform, an end to the old politics and for this to be the last election under the broken first past the post system. We will call for a citizens convention to draw up a new voting system to be put to referendum and there will be a new website (not branded by any organisation) with a petition that calls people to the rally.

This must be the last election under our broken system.

No more wasted votes. No more stitch ups.

U.S. attempting GLOBAL CENSORSHIP of GMO food labeling

(NaturalNews) I received an urgent alert from Jeffrey Smith today about a dangerous situation taking place right now at the international CODEX conference. The U.S. is attempting to push its agenda to censor all GMO labeling of foods everywhere around the world. This would result in a global GMO cover-up as consumers are left in the dark about whether their foods and grocery products are genetically modified or not.

For background on CODEX, read here.

Your help is urgently needed to send a message to the Secretaries of State (Clinton), Agriculture (Vilsack), and Health and Human Services (Sebelius) to urge them to halt the USA's nefarious attempts to install a global GMO deception.

Take part in this online petition, go here:
http://www.seedsofdeception.com/GMF...

Please understand that the U.S. is attempting to outlaw non-GMO labeling of foods, thereby making it illegal for a non-GMO food product to even claim "non-GMO" on the label. If the U.S. succeeds in this global GMO cover-up, the FDA could seize any products in the USA that make "non-GMO" claims. Additionally, the USA could file lawsuits through the World Trade Organization against any country that allows non-GMO labeling or claims on its products.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE

How should I vote in the General Election 2010?

Interesting little widget thing on the Telegraph site, didn't like the phrasing of some of the questions, but it's corporate media, never expect too much. Apparently my views are closest to UKIP.

Funny that.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7541285/How-should-I-vote-in-the-General-Election-2010.html

UK Gov spends half a billion pounds on propaganda

"Labour – lightening your wallets to correct your thinking." They can have that for free, so long as they stick it up their arse.

Ave some of that, you peasants..

The cost of Government spin leapt by 43 per cent last year, figures show.

More than £540million was spent on advertising and marketing in the year to March, despite the deepening recession.

The huge rise was last night blamed on the cost of high profile 'nanny state' campaigns to tackle obesity, smoking and climate change.

Official figures, slipped out as MPs concentrated on the swine flu epidemic, showed spending on television, press and radio advertising grew by 35 per cent to £211million.

Digital marketing, which includes the internet, soared by 84 per cent to £40million.

Other costs included 'news and PR', which rose by 52 per cent to £40.9million, while live events to spread government messages nearly trebled to £34.3million.

Just proves the position of government as the self-imposed ‘morality/ health/ thought police’ of the people. It gets worse:

Mark Lund, the chief executive of the Central Office of Information, which co-ordinates government advertising, marketing and communications, said: ' Government campaigns can help save lives and save money.

I beg your pardon?

And also prop up other parts of the economy using taxpayers money. But this next line SAYS IT ALL.

'Changing behaviour is difficult but the benefits to the taxpayer and society can repay the investment many times over.'

Changing how you think, bringing you into line with the wise, superior thoughts of the Righteous. Can’t help remembering what another Righteous said, see if you can recognise it;

Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way round, to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise.

Global Government Propaganda

Saw this while browsing in a Sainsbury’s.

It reads: ‘It’s a global thing'" – GI JOE, prepare for the new world police.

Note the language, the ‘trendy’ opening line, and the end defeatist statement. Do not choose for such a system, do not vote for such a system. Just PREPARE, for it has already been decided for you by your masters.

This is obviously designed to promote a passive response from the population by dressing up propaganda as ‘entertainment’. The ‘hidden in plain sight’ rule is actually there to desensitise the receiver to the message, increasing the probability of accepting the next phase of their world governance project. One of the chief roles of Hollywood* is conditioning of the masses to this end. A global police force is part of the New World Order that politicians/ puppets have been going on about for decades. You cannot keep a global socialist dictatorship stable without force, which is why (controlled) governments have been calling for them, like the U.S. and the EU (not that the EU is a valid government).

 

*Hollywood, as in the ‘holy, pure’ wood used for performing acts of magic, to spellbind, to distract.

Hollywood Movies and Symbolism

Muslim tries to impose Halal on British pensioners

A Muslim care home owner has been branded 'a disgrace' after banning his pensioner residents from eating bacon.

The 40 pensioners - none of them Muslim - were shocked when all pork products were cut off the menu by owner Dr Zulfikar Ali Khan.

He stopped deliveries from the butcher who supplied the home for years and instead ordered halal-meat only from another firm.

Another example of Muslim’s attempting to impose Islamic rules on non-Muslims. All part of the Jihad of course, with this Fabian-style encroaching of primitive, barbaric Sharia nonsense. Only this time people complained, so the Muslim had to back off.

Said one member of staff , who asked not to be named: 'Only halal meat was delivered to the home and all pork products such as bacon, ham sandwiches, pork pies, sausages and even lard were stopped.

'He did not consult the residents or seek their approval. Bacon sandwiches are a favourite here.

'It's also quite wrong that someone should impose their religious and cultural beliefs on others like this.

When asked about the decision, Dr Khan, who has owned the home since 1994, suggested that the halal meat had been brought in for Muslim staff - but he is believed to be the only one the only in the building.

When are people going to understand this? Muslims regard Islamic culture as superior to all others, including ours. It is the highest duty of all Muslims to convert dar el-Harb to dar el-Islam. Regardless of what they say on radio shows, television or in the neighbourhood. If they say any different then they are lying or ignorant, either position disqualifies their so-called authority on the subject. Simple.

Still, these folk at the home weren’t having it.

Said a former member of staff who still has connections with the home: 'I believe Dr Khan intended to serve only halal meat at the home but has had to think again because of the row.

'The staff have been very unhappy and the manager has just left, one of several to go in the last few years.'

People need to understand that this religious imperialism is not only condoned, but commanded by Islam. It is a holy duty. I’ll say it again, the number one priority of a true Muslim is to subjugate non-Muslim’s.

This description of 'Jihad' from Jihad Watch;

In Islam the world is uncompromisingly divided between dar al-Islam, the House of Islam, and dar al-harb, the House of War, where Infidels have not yet been subjugated to Islam. “Islam is to dominate and not to be dominated” and eventually, all of the world, which belongs to Allah, will become part of dar al-Islam.

The Jihad is the “struggle” to expand Islam, to create the conditions where Muslims may rule, and Islam may prevail.

This Jihad to spread Islam has lasted 1350 years. It has no end, until its goal is reached, whatever periods of quiescence must be observed because of lack of effective instruments or power.

Be very cautious about swine flu vaccinations

The first doses of swine flu vaccine will be given to the public before full data on its safety and effectiveness become available, doctors confirmed yesterday.

The aim is to provide maximum protection against the pandemic in the shortest possible time.

But, unlike seasonal flu vaccine, the pandemic version will be spread over two doses in a higher quantity, and one brand is expected to contain a chemical additive to make it go further, potentially increasing the risk of side-effects.

And you can’t research side-effects because it hasn’t been tested, not until they give it to you and your children that is.

Don’t be a stupid piggy and look up what happened the last time the government pushed a swine flu vaccine on the population.

One for me and none for you…

In regards to a bunch of low life scum con artists.

Smartly dressed and armed with tales of their luxury lifestyle with homes in Jamaica and Barbados, Richard and Hazel Jerome seemed every inch the affluent housebuyers.

The couple would make cash offers on top-end homes with vacant possession and, while waiting for the sale to go through, politely ask if they could rent the property as they needed to move out of their own house.

It was only after the obliging homeowners agreed that it became clear the pair were con artists.

Rent and utility bills would go unpaid and, after a string of excuses, the houses remained sold while the Jeromes claimed squatters' rights.

Mmkay, so we have established that they are lower than pig shit. What’s the time, oh my! It’s Sentence-O’Clock!

Richard Jerome, 62, was jailed for 15 months today after admitting two charges of fraud at an earlier court hearing.

He also pleaded guilty to a further fraud charge and obtaining money by deception in an unrelated incident.

His 64-year-old wife - who continued working as a primary school teacher during the fraud - was given a ten-month sentence, suspended for two years, after admitting two counts of fraud.

She must also observe a two-month curfew between 8.30pm and 6.30am.

Whatever happened to equality… Or is she automatically less guilty by virtue of having a snatch…

Family breakdown behind Broken Britain

Daily Mail

Last month, one of Britain's most senior Family Court judges described family breakdown as a national tragedy and argued marriage should be promoted by the Government to help stop 'social anarchy'.

Sir Paul Coleridge also took the extraordinary step of attacking the BBC for suppressing debate over the relationship between family breakdown and social ills by burying a TV series on the subject in a late-night slot.

The documentary series had already been put on hold until after May's local elections because of its sensitive political nature.

So much for the 'impartiality' of the BBC, and I guess it is extraordinary for a judge to have a go at the BBC, but everyone else slates it on a regular basis. It is in utter denial, just like the elected Brown-stain.

There is no doubt that the destruction of the nuclear family precipitates a whole host of ills, and it is no coincidence that times in society where crime is low, capitalism (people owning assets as opposed to debt) is high, drug abuse is low, children have strong personalities, self confidence and high self esteem etc all happen when the nuclear family is dominant. - Read 'The Garbage Generation'.

The reasons are obvious.

Not that I know of the solution to this problem, being just an individual in a society of millions but I have an idea of where the problem lies.

The judge is right to attack the BBC and the government, but these policies where in play long before this current crop of globalist traitors was in power, and ironically it is the issue of inequality between men and women that has created it.

An imbalance created not by men but by feminism. Demanding that women be given preferential treatment in child custody, the introduction of no-fault divorces and the subsequent transfer of capital to the woman, the willing attacks of men by the State (to appease the female vote) have all led to where we are. From 'The Fatherless Family' by Civitas;

It has long been recognised that children growing up in lone-mother households are more likely to have emotional, academic, and financial problems and are more likely to engage in behaviour associated with social exclusion, such as offending, teenage pregnancy, alcohol and drug abuse or worklessness.

But considering that feminism is a socialist/ Marxist creation, it should come as no surprise that the Fabian cartel desire the destruction of the male in society. Removing the father leaves a void that the State desires to fill, for it wants to become the centre of everything. This is why the State subsidises single mother 'families' using our money, a massive redistribution of wealth from men (the majority contributor of taxes) to women, mainly through tax credits, income support and child benefits/ child support.

The only reason these families exist so comfortably is because of the State. Once upon a time being a single parent was seen as a mark of shame, now the feminist media (and Marxist government) reward you for it.

Seeing single mothers with broods of kids swarming about during the day can only exist because someone is paying for it. The money they get is not 'free'. Someone, somewhere, has to get up out of bed, go to work and earn it. Earn it and get it taken away from them to pay for someone else's huge, unproductive family. We all (should) know that the Welfare System is supposed to be a safety net, not a hammock, so paring the system back will not only save the taxpayer billions, but will also be treating the productive sector that pays for it, with more 'equality'.

The best way is to scrap income tax and reduce the welfare state to its bare essentials. For example, no child benefit past one child. No social subsidies of ANY kind for immigrants unless they have contributed for a number of (6) years (details aren't important as I'm just spouting ideas). Scrap the tax credits system, remove the endless streams of red tape from the administration of welfare.

The nuclear family/ marriage does not need to be promoted by the government. It is just that the government needs to stop promoting feminist ideology as national policy and return to treating society as a collection of individuals, and not as collectivist groups (which they can then manipulate to create social chaos). This is not about pushing my personal agenda on the country, this is about cutting down State spending, leaving money in the pockets of the earners. Critics would say this would only make the gulf between poor and wealthy greater, but so what?

That's why people go to work, because they want to earn more money/ be more productive. Plus, if they own their own bodies, they should own the fruits of their labour, in this case that would be cash. For the government to forcibly take a large portion (income tax) is essentially the same as the goverment enslaving you for a few days of your working week, although the reality is somewhat worse (24 Jun 2009);

Today is Cost of Government Day. Average taxpayers in Britain now have to work almost half the year – 176 days – to pay their share of the cost of running Gordon Brown’s administration. Every penny we have earned since January 1 has gone to feed the state leviathan. It is only from today that, at last, you have started working for yourselves and your families.

The slave trade is dead, long live the slave trade!