Family breakdown behind Broken Britain

Daily Mail

Last month, one of Britain's most senior Family Court judges described family breakdown as a national tragedy and argued marriage should be promoted by the Government to help stop 'social anarchy'.

Sir Paul Coleridge also took the extraordinary step of attacking the BBC for suppressing debate over the relationship between family breakdown and social ills by burying a TV series on the subject in a late-night slot.

The documentary series had already been put on hold until after May's local elections because of its sensitive political nature.

So much for the 'impartiality' of the BBC, and I guess it is extraordinary for a judge to have a go at the BBC, but everyone else slates it on a regular basis. It is in utter denial, just like the elected Brown-stain.

There is no doubt that the destruction of the nuclear family precipitates a whole host of ills, and it is no coincidence that times in society where crime is low, capitalism (people owning assets as opposed to debt) is high, drug abuse is low, children have strong personalities, self confidence and high self esteem etc all happen when the nuclear family is dominant. - Read 'The Garbage Generation'.

The reasons are obvious.

Not that I know of the solution to this problem, being just an individual in a society of millions but I have an idea of where the problem lies.

The judge is right to attack the BBC and the government, but these policies where in play long before this current crop of globalist traitors was in power, and ironically it is the issue of inequality between men and women that has created it.

An imbalance created not by men but by feminism. Demanding that women be given preferential treatment in child custody, the introduction of no-fault divorces and the subsequent transfer of capital to the woman, the willing attacks of men by the State (to appease the female vote) have all led to where we are. From 'The Fatherless Family' by Civitas;

It has long been recognised that children growing up in lone-mother households are more likely to have emotional, academic, and financial problems and are more likely to engage in behaviour associated with social exclusion, such as offending, teenage pregnancy, alcohol and drug abuse or worklessness.

But considering that feminism is a socialist/ Marxist creation, it should come as no surprise that the Fabian cartel desire the destruction of the male in society. Removing the father leaves a void that the State desires to fill, for it wants to become the centre of everything. This is why the State subsidises single mother 'families' using our money, a massive redistribution of wealth from men (the majority contributor of taxes) to women, mainly through tax credits, income support and child benefits/ child support.

The only reason these families exist so comfortably is because of the State. Once upon a time being a single parent was seen as a mark of shame, now the feminist media (and Marxist government) reward you for it.

Seeing single mothers with broods of kids swarming about during the day can only exist because someone is paying for it. The money they get is not 'free'. Someone, somewhere, has to get up out of bed, go to work and earn it. Earn it and get it taken away from them to pay for someone else's huge, unproductive family. We all (should) know that the Welfare System is supposed to be a safety net, not a hammock, so paring the system back will not only save the taxpayer billions, but will also be treating the productive sector that pays for it, with more 'equality'.

The best way is to scrap income tax and reduce the welfare state to its bare essentials. For example, no child benefit past one child. No social subsidies of ANY kind for immigrants unless they have contributed for a number of (6) years (details aren't important as I'm just spouting ideas). Scrap the tax credits system, remove the endless streams of red tape from the administration of welfare.

The nuclear family/ marriage does not need to be promoted by the government. It is just that the government needs to stop promoting feminist ideology as national policy and return to treating society as a collection of individuals, and not as collectivist groups (which they can then manipulate to create social chaos). This is not about pushing my personal agenda on the country, this is about cutting down State spending, leaving money in the pockets of the earners. Critics would say this would only make the gulf between poor and wealthy greater, but so what?

That's why people go to work, because they want to earn more money/ be more productive. Plus, if they own their own bodies, they should own the fruits of their labour, in this case that would be cash. For the government to forcibly take a large portion (income tax) is essentially the same as the goverment enslaving you for a few days of your working week, although the reality is somewhat worse (24 Jun 2009);

Today is Cost of Government Day. Average taxpayers in Britain now have to work almost half the year – 176 days – to pay their share of the cost of running Gordon Brown’s administration. Every penny we have earned since January 1 has gone to feed the state leviathan. It is only from today that, at last, you have started working for yourselves and your families.

The slave trade is dead, long live the slave trade!