Consent must be given, it is never assumed

So there I was, thinking about the logic of the title statement. If a door to a house is open, does that mean you have consent to enter it? If a car boot is open, does that automatically mean you can help yourself to whatever is in it?

Of course not. This is one of the foundational pillars of a private property based society (i.e, a free society). Consent must be given. Now it should come as no surprise that the ever growing state seems to think it is above this basic rule (although nobody gave them consent to it). This little fact on its own should convince any and everyone that a revolution is needed. In a democracy the consent of the majority can override that of the minority. The truth is, there is no majority or minority. These are collectivist conveniences. There are only individuals. Only in a totalitarian, Marxist-style system can anyone (or group) demand the stripping of private property from another. Perfect for the ‘abolish private property’ mantra of collectivist ideologies such as socialism, communism, feminism and environmentalism.

I am about to opt out of this NHS corporate data mining project, called Summary Care Records. I have to opt out, because apparently the state was already decided that I want to opt in. They didn’t ask me obviously. Just like they didn’t ask me about bailing out banks and charging me the bill (illegal), going to war in the Middle East (illegal) and so on.

Consent is important, so are ‘rights’. They, like sunlight from the sun, are consequences of ownership. Simply put, you only have rights (consent is one) over things you own (such as yourself). Things you don’t own you have no rights over.

Simple isn’t it.

I don’t have the legal right to give you consent to enter someone else’s home and start eating out their fridge, any more than I can’t give you consent to have sex with that girl over there.

This applies to absolutely everyone. No one is exempt. It is the Great Equaliser. Socialist constructs like The Human Rights Act are not only disruptive to this logic, it is illegal (I’ll deal with this in another post). We are all equal in our rights over our own property and equally powerless over anyone else’s. Society, (from the beggar all the way up to the government) is composed of individuals. ‘Government’ doesn’t exist as a real thing, it is a virtual object that describes a group of individuals, nothing more. As such, the government should have no rights to assume consent of your property (your medical data, your organs or whatever).

They can’t do this because they don’t own you, right? I mean, if they did then you would be a slave in every meaning of the word. If they owned you, they would be able take money directly out of your pay check before you even get it. They could fine you arbitrarily, stop you from gathering as free people and protesting, ignore you when you actively reject government proposals, sell your private data to corporations, shoot you in the head because you ‘don’t look right’, pass laws purely for the purpose of taking more of your money, call you all racists and bigots for asking questions about changes in your local area, they can even sign you up to legal contracts so foreigners can tell you how you live your life and charge you hundreds of billions while they do it and even give voting rights to people who aren’t British. They could take the currency you have to use as payment for the use of your property (body) for production (provision of goods and services) and deliberately devalue it. They could borrow money from private banks that charge interest and demand you pay it.

Wait a minute…

A dispatch from an occupied country

EU Referendum

From today, as the Lisbon treaty comes into force, we are no longer masters in our own house. Our prime minister, as a member of the European Council, is obligated under this new treaty to promote the aims and objectives of the European Union, over and above those of the UK, and is bound by the rules of the Union.

Of course, this will make no immediate difference. It simply renders de jure what has been de facto for several decades, but the coming into force of the treaty marks an important symbolic turning point. We are no longer an independent country, de jure. Our prime minister and his government are now working for an alien government, based in Brussels.

Welcome to the Fourth Reich comrades.

P.S. Take note that not one corporate media website has any mention of the official end of Britain as a sovereign nation, the EU as a legal entity or the fact our government is merely a proxy to impose EU directives...

I always saw the signing of the Lisbon Treaty as an Act of War against the British people...

Ten Years On: Britain Without the European Union

I got it free from the Taxpayer Alliance email but it is only £5.99 anyway. Get it (and more) from the greateudebate.com

I started making notes to post quotes, but I would end up typing up 50% of the book. Going through numbers, billions of pounds here, billions there, just flowing out the pockets of the People of Britain, people who earn it through sweat and toil, only to be pissed away on greasing the palms of poor countries and buying off politicians, setting up quangos and throwing money at media to promote the 'correct way of thinking about the EU', usual behaviour of a corrupt regime.

Do not think about the fact that individual freedom is the blood cell of a healthy, free society, and that the EU is the opposite of that. Putting aside the corrupt money flows, whereby the accounts of the EU haven't been signed off for 15 years or more, or the historical connection between the EEC cum EU and the Nazi 'Fourth Reich' plan, or the complete lack of democratic accountability and the blatant and consistent disregard for you view or the consequences of their decisions upon your life. Just put aside the 100,000+ pages of rules and diktats the EU has created to 'regulate' your life ad infinitum, even though simple logic would dictate that the more laws you have, the less free you are, seeing as rules and laws cannot add to freedom (freedom is an absence of law). Think about that, (in gross payments) we have been forced (because we didn't consent) into giving the EU approx a quarter of a trillion pounds of YOUR money, so you can be told what you can or cannot do, lest you be forced to pay them even more. The benefits of the EU are?

In every decision in life, whether you realise it or not, you carry out a risk-benefit assessment. Is going up to that girl at the bar worth the potential date later? The cost of that van worth the potential extra business? Think about how the EU benefits you. Forget their waffle, the expensive leaflets and propaganda. Try and think how paying the EU over £12,300 per minute, 24/7 year in, year out, benefits you. Compare it to how much you think it would benefit you by not paying it, and by not being told what to do.

I did say the book was short, I read it in a matter of hours without hardly trying. Unfortunately most people under the age of 18 can't read, but for those who can, get a copy.

I have picked a quote from the book, I think this sums up the EU nicely.

"Britain is paying a premium to belong to a gym that beats it up" - Ten Years On, pg 73 (Paraphrased)

They have been pummeling the Great British Bulldog for decades, trying to push us down to the level of lower nations, in true global communist fashion. Drugging it with media and celebrity nonsense, smoke and mirrors with the corrupted Parliament, sucking out its life blood, shutting down production, stripping away ancient freedoms and so on. Just trying to weaken this Animal of Freedom so they can get close enough to skin it, and harvest its organs.

But guess what. Britain is still here. Everybody I know is pissed off with the government. All it takes it explaining to people what is going on so they can connect the dots, and that is beginning to happen.

Indeed, I think that Bulldog is beginning to stir. Its ear flicked and it has opened an eye. It can see that it is surrounded by enemies, red, blue and green feathers on yellow bodies, circling like vultures, all wanting a piece of the Prize Pooch. The oldest and most illustrious of democracies.

Once it is full awake, it is game over for these spineless, slithering snakes.

2010 is going to be very interesting.

The Truth about Global Warming stories

Remember this,

"The threat of environmental crisis will be the 'international disaster key' that will unlock the New World Order." [Mikhail Gorbachev, quoted in "A Special Report: The Wildlands Project Unleashes Its War On Mankind", by Marilyn Brannan, Associate Editor, Monetary & Economic Review, 1996, p. 5.]

Everyone knows the term New World Order alludes to a global centralised technocratic super government. Like the EU but global and even worse.

Now this is released.

A United Nations document on “climate change” that will be distributed to a major environmental conclave next week envisions a huge reordering of the world economy, likely involving trillions of dollars in wealth transfer, millions of job losses and gains, new taxes, industrial relocations, new tariffs and subsidies, and complicated payments for greenhouse gas abatement schemes and carbon taxes — all under the supervision of the world body.

This is the main thrust of the climate change scam. Pushing for a supranational legal framework, specifically designed to usurp the sovereignty of nation states but by proxy, the individual sovereignty of us all.

I add the following quotes for your consideration.

David Rockefeller Sept. 23, 1994 "This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long - We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."

Note the image on the right of the blog, of the newspaper.

"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." -David Rockefeller, from his own book, Memoirs.

We are moving toward a new world order, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.” — Mikhail Gorbachev 1987

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto determination practiced in past centuries"--David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991

"The invisible Money Power is working to control and enslave mankind. It financed Communism, Fascism, Marxism, Zionism, Socialism. All of these are directed to making the United States a member of a World Government ..." -- AMERICAN MERCURY MAGAZINE, December 1957, pg. 92.

"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits." — SIR JOSIAH STAMP, (President of the Bank of England in the 1920's, the second richest man in Britain)


“We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” — Statement made before the United States Senate on Feb. 7, 1950 by James Paul Warburg

"I am convinced that the agreement [Bretton Woods] will enthrone a world dictatorship of private finance more complete and terrible than a Hitlerite dream. It offers no solution of world problems, but quite blatantly sets up controls which will reduce the smaller nations to vassal states and make every government the mouthpiece and tool of International Finance. It will undermine and destroy the democratic institutions of this country - in fact as effectively as ever the Fascist forces could have done - and will undoubtedly present a new menace, endangering world peace. World collaboration of private financial interests can only mean mass unemployment, slavery, misery, degradation and financial destruction. -- Labor Minister of Australia, Eddie Ward, during the inception of the World Bank and Bretton Woods, he gave this warning.

All throughout history, tyrants have sought global domination. Our time is no different. The human race struggles against itself, seeking to drag itself away from these primitive insecurities, trying to quench them with never ending power and wealth. As far as Britain is concerned, people should educate themselves on a few things. The nature of money, how banks operate, and if you own yourself or if you are a slave to others. I will elaborate on this shortly.

Make no mistake, running serves no purpose whatsoever. We are born to fight for our freedom against parasites, and by God, this is what I shall do!

More attacks on lifestyle by the state

More propaganda

Stronger drinks - and larger measures - have become more popular in recent years, and the study warns that drinkers could be unwittingly risking their health even if they do not go out on “binges”.

Jonny Forsyth, senior drink analyst for Mintel, the leading market research analysts who produced the report, said: “The over-45s are drinking more regularly but not thinking they’re in danger.

Danger? Oh no!

“Alcohol has also got stronger so it doesn’t take as much to get your units.

Alcohol has gotten stronger eh. Don’t they mean alcoholic drinks? I guess in their rush to panic people they forgot to actually think about what the hell they were writing. Same as with cannabis. I’m surprised they haven’t linked it to terrorism. Yet.

Note the repeated statements about ‘units’. Your state-mandated allowed alcohol intake, those same units that are completely fabricated.

The Mintel report warns that although the total volume of alcohol being consumed is falling, as wine overtakes beer in popularity, people are often buying stronger drinks without realising it.

That is an assumption. It is also highly offensive, they assume people are too thick to read alcohol contents on bottles. But that is the general attitude to people these days, hence the nanny state, to protect you from yourselves.

The Office for National Statistics was forced last year to change its method for calculation safe drinking levels to reflect increasing strengths, as well as the trend for larger wine glasses.

So, alcohol use is falling, but the state forces the ONS to cook its books in order to keep up the War on Drinkers.

A large 250ml glass of wine is now classed as three units, as is a pint of continental lager.

Says who? Not me, so fuck ‘em. Now they have indoctrinated the public about these moon-units, they are slowly changing the goal posts, lowering the threshold of ‘acceptable alcohol use’ and trying to force people to feel guilty about drinking (again). Give it time and they will be classing the 250ml glass as four units, then five etc. The result is the same amount of drinking can be manipulated to convey a false image of ‘more units being consumed’.

So what really is the point of this article, apart from demonising innocent people living their lives.

Professor Ian Gilmore, President of the Royal College of Physicians, said: "This study shows very clearly that our problems with alcohol are not confined to binge-drinking youngsters – there is a striking increase in overall consumption in the last decade that mirrors the rising deaths from cirrhosis and other health consequences. Many regular drinkers who don’t consider themselves at risk are undoubtedly exceeding safe limits as drinks get stronger.

"This has to be tackled by providing better unit labelling information, but if we are to make an impact on the escalating health damage this must also be accompanied by bringing down the total amount we drink as a nation through a minimum unit price for alcohol.”

My emphasis. See, there is always an agenda with these prop pieces. I have said it before and I’ll say it again.

The biggest problems we have are not drinking, or cannabis or whatever. It’s the government itself. It needs to GO.

Government to ban pint glasses

What a bunch of patronising cunts.

Plans to replace the traditional pint glass with one made of unbreakable plastic will not be accepted by drinkers, the pub industry has warned.

Damn right, who the fuck wants to pay the massively inflated costs of a pint these days, only to have it served in a piece of plastic. Let’s hear the excuse for this latest volley against freedom.

The Home Office has commissioned a new design, in an attempt to stop glasses being used as weapons.

Official figures show 5,500 people are attacked with glasses and bottles every year in England and Wales.

I'm sure I don't have to point out the absurdly low number of attacks this constitutes in the scheme of the number of pubs and revellers. More people die needlessly under the care of the NHS each year. There are over 7000 pubs in London alone. According to the same article;

126 million pints per week are served in the UK. Now that sounds high to me, but anyway.

126 million * 52 weeks = over 6 billion 500 million pints per year.

5,500 people are attacked each year with the evil pint glass. This amounts to a less than 0.00009 percent attack rate. This figure is so low I’ve convinced myself that I calculated the percentage wrong. Another way of looking at this is the average pub goer will have a 1 in 1,181,818 chance of this happening to them.

There is no logical reason for this whatsoever. What’s next, banning metal knives and forks?

Neil Williams from the association said he was concerned that drinkers would notice a drop in quality:

"For the drinker, the pint glass feels better, it has a nice weight and the drink coats the glass nicely. That's why people go out for a drink, to have a nice experience".

Something this fucking piss poor excuse for a government is doing its best to destroy using its favourite weapon; bureaucracy.

Mr Williams said the industry feared extra costs at a time when many pubs were struggling in the recession: "It would impose another cost on us. Red tape is already coming from all sides."

More costs, more regulations, more excuses for the government to watch and control private enterprise. Still, the Ministry of Freedom Home Office is adamant that us peasants accept the new programming. What to do?

Nick Verebelyi, the designer in charge of delivering the new pint, said they were looking at two approaches.

"One is to coat the glass with a substance that will make sure the glass doesn't shatter into pieces when it is broken - that could be a plastic material for example.

Whatever, I want my pint in a glass, not in some oestrogen leaking plastic container. By the way, do you know how easy it is to break a plastic pint, er cup? And what of the possibility of people using pint containers even more because ‘it’s just plastic’. I’ll lob this pint because it’s only plastic what’s the worst that can happen? Another big fucking waste of public funds.

Mr Verebelyi said he accepted that drinkers are attached to the traditional glass pint: "You make a change and there is often opposition, we've got to make it appealing to them.

"We've got to make it desirable and acceptable and cool.

"There's going to be quite a push behind this in terms of the Home Office."

Translation: We need to re-engineer people to think they way we want them to.

The Home Office Minister, Alan Campbell, said the redesign could make a significant difference to the number of revellers who are injured.

He said: "Innovative design has played an important role in driving down overall crime, including theft, fraud and burglary.

"This project will see those same skills applied to the dangerous and costly issue of alcohol-related crime and I am confident that it will lead to similar successes."

Bullshit. Note in the last sentence he says this should reduce alcohol related crime. But I thought this was about pint glasses in the face? Alcohol-related could mean any-fucking-thing, especially when the state has an agenda.

Fairness – the weasel word

Planning laws are deliberately biased in favour of gipsies and travellers, a Government minister has finally admitted.

After years of official denials on the issue, Communities Secretary Shahid Malik confessed that travelling families are treated differently from 'the settled community'.

Justifying the policy, the minister said: 'Fairness does not mean treating people equally; it means addressing the different needs of different people.'

Read that carefully. Fairness does NOT mean treating people equally, it means treating people differently according to their needs.

Their needs should be irrelevant. The Law is the Law. There are two types of egalitarian, the ones who call for equality of opportunity (Rule of Law) and those who want equality of outcome. (Socialism). Guess which one this slimy little shit is speaking of. Still this slimy Muslim dickhead usurper has no qualms with undermining the ancient Rule of Law. As he himself has said, what he really wants is a Muslim dominated Parliament and the establishment of a Britain ruled by a vicious, barbaric seventh-century death cult.

Anyway, equality of outcome is when you pay the same prize money to the winner of Women’s Wimbledon than you do to the mens’, ignoring the fact that the men play more sets. It would be like paying me the same salary as you only I work three days a week, you still work five.

You may as well take it further and say pay everyone the same, regardless of what they do and how much they work. Would look lovely on paper no? Imagine what society would really be like however. No tractors for you!

You should not be surprised though, Communism was designed specifically to collapse Western, individualist capital based societies as they believed their New Internationalist Order could only truly be born from the ashes of the old.

Swine Flu Vaccine Linked to Paralysis

(NaturalNews) A warning letter about the swine flu vaccine was leaked to the DailyMail over the weekend. Written by Professor Elizabeth Miller, head of the Health Protection Agency's Immunization Department, it warns neurologists that the influenza vaccine of 1976 was linked to a devastating neurological condition called Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS). "The vaccines used to combat an expected swine influenza pandemic in 1976 were shown to be associated with GBS and were withdrawn from use," says the July 29 letter.

GBS can cause paralysis and death. One woman mentioned in the DailyMail story -- Hilary Wilkinson -- was stricken with GBS and had to be fed through a drip while needing a tracheotomy just to breathe. It took her three months in the hospital to learn how to walk and talk again. On the topic of the swine flu vaccine, she says today, "It makes me feel wary that the Government is rolling out this vaccine without any clear idea of the GBS risk, if any. I wouldn't wish it on anyone... I'm frightened to have the swine flu vaccine if this might happen again -- it's a frightening illness and I think more research needs to be done on the effect of the vaccine."

No, no research! Just rush them out, make lots of money for the indemnified Big Pharma corps. Don’t look into the ingredients and their side effects, even Glaxo doesn’t know what they are, and it’s making the damn stuff. We do know about some of the ingredients though, have a look here, for the potential damage it can do.

Women in Islam

There has been a fair bit of talk lately on this issue with the Burka, or Burkini or whatever. Recently it was banned in France (well done lads);

A French mother was banned from wearing the three-piece outfit at her local swimming pool.

Carole, a 35-year- old Muslim convert, was told it was ' inappropriate' on hygiene grounds, but she insists the ban is racial discrimination.

It follows French President Nicolas Sarkozy recently attacking Muslim burkhas as a 'sign of subservience' for women and saying they should be banned.

Racial discrimination. For a religious garment. Race and religion are two different things, so we already know the mental limitation of this female, I mean she converted to Islam so don’t expect any sort of intellect here.

Women have rights that are similar to men, but men are "a degree above them." 2:228

Pat Condell weighed in on the subject with typical clarity and humour, worth a watch.

Like Pat, I too am wondering where all the rabid feminists are on this subject. Harriet the Man Hater, all too happy to portray women as victims of their sex (while equal at the same time, go figure) hasn’t uttered a peep. I suppose Muslims must come before white women in her twisted cultural Marxist worldview. Feminists are social parasites and they make me sick.

A woman is worth one-half a man. 2:282

Now it is probably common knowledge now that the wearing of this Burka is not a requirement of Islam. More Muslim women seem to wear it in the West than they do in the Middle East, which just me think it is a form of Islamic cultural warfare. Doing their utmost to broadcast that they want to be different, see us as different and do not wish to communicate in the way we in the West have done for hundreds of years.

"All married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess." You can't have sex with married women, unless they are slaves obtained in war (with whom you may rape or do whatever you like). 4:24

There was a female Muslim convert on LBC the other day defending wearing the Burka, saying she joined Islam because it is ‘liberating and peaceful’. Dressing up like an out of shape ninja is liberating is it? She said she liked the ‘modesty’. So she wanted to dress modestly and joined Islam to do it? She couldn’t just, you know, DRESS MODESTLY?

Women are feeble and are unable to devise a plan. 4:98

She obviously has done ZERO research into Islam, preferring to just listen to local Muslims talk shit about it, themselves probably knowing next to nothing about it. Did you know the Islamic rule for leaving the religion is death, and they imposed this rule because they were worried many Muslims would leave Islam on Mohammed’s passing, after finding out the true hatred and violence ingrained in the religion?

Believing women must lower their gaze and be modest, cover themselves with veils, and not reveal themselves except to their husbands, relatives, children, and slaves. 24:31

Of course you didn’t. Like usual, people don’t do their own research anymore, being infantile and lazy (like the humans in Pixars’ Wall-E) choosing instead to base their worldly knowledge on sanitised nonsense drip fed to them via the corporate media and the state. View this strange article in the Telegraph;

Women are allowed in mosques but there are always separate rooms in which they pray.

The Koran doesn’t specifically say married couples should be separated at weddings, but it is a long-standing custom.

It is customary that the male and female guests are served separate wedding banquets and only at the end do the married couple sit together, sometimes under a headscarf while prayers are read.

This separation of sexes is part of the religion’s emphasis on chastity and modesty, which is also reflected in the way many Muslim women cover their faces and bodies in public.

Isn’t that sweet? Islam just wants its women to be chase and modest. Nothing to do with viewing women as inferior to men then. Nothing to do with women being seen as meat by Muslim men, interpretations of which lead to women being raped, and then found guilty of sex outside marriage! An example from Pakistan.

Hudood laws are a tool in the hands of men - with these laws they can rape women and be totally unaccountable.

Under Hudood if a woman makes a rape allegation she must provide four pious male witnesses or face a charge of adultery herself.

So a woman is in the ridiculous position of having to produce four Muslim adult male eyewitnesses, men who just stood there and watched.

If sex by force is not proved, this woman can be charged with "zina" - sex outside of marriage.

Uzma Saeed believes the Hudood ordinances should be repealed

About 60% of women in our jails have been imprisoned as a result of Hudood laws.

This Islamic rule was superseded by the Women Protection Bill in 2006, but that bill has come under attack for being un-Islamic.

The Religious political parties however are against the Bill calling it un-Islamic. They argue that the bill goes against articles 2a and 227 of the constitution of Pakistan, which state respectively that "Islam will be the state religion" and "No laws will be passed which are repugnant to the Koran and sunnah."

There is no doubt about it. Men and women are not equal under their God. Girls have been stoned to death for being raped, from November ‘08;

A 13-year-old girl who said she had been raped was stoned to death in Somalia after being accused of adultery by Islamic militants, a human rights group said.

Religion of Peace? Fuck off. There are a number of things you need to take into consideration if you want to formulate a thorough understanding about the true face of Islam.

1. The teachings of the Koran, Hadiths and Sunnahs, Shariah etc

2. What Mohammed himself did and said (remember he is the example of the perfect man to all Muslims, so they must agree and defend all of his actions).

3. What actually occurs in Islamic states around the world today.

4. What has occurred in Islamic states throughout history.

5. What is happening in Western states with mass immigration of Muslims.

Just listening to a few apologists on the corporate media or some ignorant Muslim is insufficient in building an honest understanding of this so-called Religion of Peace.

If you want a summary of the treatment of women under Islam from a technical perspective, start here;

Women’s Worth in Islam

And some more info on the ideology.

The Myths of Islam

Tamiflu and Swine Flu vaccine research

I hope you guys are paying attention to the latest wave of news regarding the negative effects of Tamiflu, and that is an ‘established’ antiviral.

Google News Listing

Remember the Swine Flu vaccine (which they are subtly demanding the whole world takes) has had no such ‘testing’. On top of that it (Relenza) contains the adjuvant AS03. This can be confirmed by the following page on the Glaxo website, which states;

The vaccine will comprise antigen of the recently isolated A (H1N1) influenza strain and also contain GSK's proprietary adjuvant system AS03.

AS03 contains Squalene plus Vitamin-E (Why?) plus Polysorbate-80 (Tween-80) which is another additive that crosses the blood-brain barrier and is thought to create adverse effects (it's in Gardasil).

Regarding squalene;

Your immune system recognizes squalene as an oil molecule native to your body. It is found throughout your nervous system and brain. In fact, you can consume squalene in olive oil and not only will your immune system recognize it, you will also reap the benefits of its antioxidant properties.

The difference between “good” and “bad” squalene is the route by which it enters your body. Injection is an abnormal route of entry which incites your immune system to attack all the squalene in your body, not just the vaccine adjuvant.

Your immune system will attempt to destroy the molecule wherever it finds it, including in places where it occurs naturally, and where it is vital to the health of your nervous system

Polysorbate-80 is known to cause infertility.

Polysorbate 80 (also known as tween 80) is a stabilizer used in a wide variety of products including ice cream, milk products, vitamin tablets, lotions and creams and medical products like vaccines and anti-cancer medications.

It is toxic and should not be eaten, drunk, put on the skin or injected.

According to Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Volume 95, Number 6, December 2005 , pp. 593-599(7), "it is of current relevance as a 'hidden' inductor of anaphylactoid reactions", and "Polysorbate 80 was identified as the causative agent for the anaphylactoid reaction of nonimmunologic origin in the patient. Conclusions: Polysorbate 80 is a ubiquitously used solubilizing agent that can cause severe nonimmunologic anaphylactoid reactions."

Put in plain English, polysorbate 80 can affect your immune system and cause severe anaphylactic shock which can kill.

It also goes by the name Tween 80 (Polysorbate 80) -- Polyoxyethylene Sorbitan Monooleate (polyoxyethylenesorbitan monooleat);

“Gardasil contains Polysorbate 80, which is linked to infertility in mice,” noted Dee Nicholson, National Communications Director for Freedom in Canadian Health Care. [Nov 2007] Sleight of Handling: More Merck Magic Tricks With HPV Vaccine By Christopher C. Barr

A study published in December, 2005 discovered that Tween80 can cause anaphylaxis, a sometimes fatal reaction characterized by a sharp drop in blood pressure, hives, and breathing difficulties. Researchers concluded that the severe reaction was not a typical allergic response characterized by the combination of IgE antibodies and the release of histamines; it was caused by a serious disruption that had occurred within the immune system. Exploring Vaccines

According to the World Intellectual Property Organization, which is part of the United Nations, scientists from the organization are developing vaccines specifically to damage fertility as a method of contraception. A suggested ingredient for the vaccine is tween 80 (polysorbate 80): “In a preferred embodiment the vaccine comprises oil, preferably a biodegradable oil such as squalene oil. Typically, the vaccine is prepared using an adjuvant concentrate which contains lecithin in squalene oil. The aqueous solution glycoprotein is typically a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution, and additionally preferably contains Tween 80.” (Fertility Impairing Vaccine And Methods of Use’ This application claims the benefit of U. S. Provisional Application No. 60/070,375, filed January 2,1998, U. S. Provisional Application No. 60/071,406, filed January 15,1998.) Exploring Vaccines

It also contains Thiomersal;

Thiomersal (INN) (C9H9HgNaO2S), or sodium ethylmercurithiosalicylate, commonly known in the United States as thimerosal, is an organomercury compound (approximately 49% mercury by weight) used as an antiseptic and antifungal agent.

No mercury or mercury derivative should ever enter your body, there is no safe quantity. Mercury itself is extremely toxic to living organisms;

The World Health Organization declared there is no safe level of mercury for human beings - in other words, mercury is so poisonous that no amount of mercury absorption is safe. (1992)

We now know Thiomersal is an organic mercury compound;

Compounds of mercury tend to be much more toxic than the element itself, and organic compounds of mercury are often extremely toxic and have been implicated in causing brain and liver damage. The most dangerous mercury compound, dimethylmercury, is so toxic that even a few microliters spilled on the skin, or even a latex glove, can cause death.

There is also a possible mass sterilisation vector to these vaccines, considering the toxic ingredients and the deliberate stoking up of fear by governments, supranational organisations (WHO) and the MSM. There is a long list of documented sterilisation via vaccine programmes.

Vaccines: Sterilisation & Abortion

Mercury, Autism and the Global Vaccine Agenda

Obama’s current ‘science czar’ John P. Holdren co-wrote a book called Ecoscience advocating mass global sterilisation programmes using vaccines, medicated tap water and other vectors. Another one of the books’ authors, Paul H. Erlick is another rabid depopulate the planet advocate.

I strongly recommend you check all of the links on this page, read through the respective articles and do you own additional research.

Think about it, if this is the information we can uncover about these vaccines, imagine what we don’t know, and even if you don’t believe everything on here (hence you should self-check) the mere fact that so much negative data exists regarding them should make you think twice with ‘just trusting the government, they know best’.

The final responsibility for your health and that of your children does not rest with the WHO or your government, they don’t love you or your family, you are merely a statistic to them. Would you trust that complete strangers will look out for you and your family with more love and attention than you would?

Of course not.

Britain has more CCTV than China

Britain has one and a half times as many surveillance cameras as communist China, despite having a fraction of its population, shocking figures reveal.

There are 4.2million closed circuit TV cameras here, one per every 14 people.

But in police state China, which has a population of 1.3billion, there are just 2.75million cameras, the equivalent of one for every 472,000 of its citizens.

Simon Davies from pressure group Privacy International said the astonishing statistic highlighted Britain's 'worrying obsession' with surveillance.

'Britain has established itself as the model state that the Chinese authorities would love to have,' he said.

'As far as surveillance goes, Britain has created the blueprint for the 21st century  non-democratic regime.

'It was not intended but it has certainly been the consequence.'

Oh, it was intended. Everything they are doing to destroy this beautiful country is intended. You don’t accidentally fall into a police state, or sign away the worlds most illustrious, ancient democracy in the world to a Nazi wet dream. While people, commentators, MP’s and media continue to make excuses for it, it will keep getting worse.

Denial is not a river in Egypt, it is a Road to Hell.

Muslim Europe

Britain and the rest of the European Union are ignoring a demographic time bomb: a recent rush into the EU by migrants, including millions of Muslims, will change the continent beyond recognition over the next two decades, and almost no policy-makers are talking about it.

The numbers are startling. Only 3.2 per cent of Spain's population was foreign-born in 1998. In 2007 it was 13.4 per cent. Europe's Muslim population has more than doubled in the past 30 years and will have doubled again by 2015. In Brussels, the top seven baby boys' names recently were Mohamed, Adam, Rayan, Ayoub, Mehdi, Amine and Hamza.

This was the whole point of Multiculturalism, to import many foreign cultures for the purpose of weakening the indigenous culture. Remember, the goal of the EU is one vast state, as are the goals of the African Union, Asian Union and the NAU. After that they will simply be ‘harmonised’ with each other and then merged into a global state under a global government. A world empire. Britain is particularly important because of its history with freedom and democracy. It is the epicentre for it, therefore it must be destroyed for their global agenda. Islam is particularly desired because its entire structure exists in opposition to the principles of Western freedom and democracy.

The growing Muslim population is of particular interest. This is not because Muslims are the only immigrants coming into the EU in large numbers; there are plenty of entrants from all points of the compass. But Muslims represent a particular set of issues beyond the fact that atrocities have been committed in the West in the name of Islam.

Over 13,700 acts of deadly violence in the name of Islam, according to the Religion of Peace website, and follow a religion that consider non-Muslims are the ‘vilest of animals, lower than pigs or dogs and are the enemy, never to be trusted or taken as friends. And apologists have nerve to blame the existence of Muslim ghetto’s on the host nations! As if it is the duty of a sovereign nation to kow tow to foreign cultures, rules and customs.

America's Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, part of the non-partisan Pew Research Center, said in a report: "These [EU] countries possess deep historical, cultural, religious and linguistic traditions. Injecting hundreds of thousands, and in some cases millions, of people who look, speak and act differently into these settings often makes for a difficult social fit."

It is a recipe for chaos, not merely a ‘difficult social fit’, but if the endgame is the destruction of the host cultures of democratic countries, then it makes sense. This is the primary reason for the globalist Human Rights Act. It deliberately makes no distinction between law-abiding and criminal, indigenous or foreign, contributor or not.

This unlimited immigration is a form of warfare. Same as the BOE’s money printing is economic warfare and feminism is social, ‘nuclear family’ warfare.

"To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas." - Dr. G. Brock Chisolm

Obama's Eugenics Hoax Exposed

NuffRespect

An informative video from Rob Wanek (NsaneSk8er007), who has kindly given me permission to repost it here. Rob writes:

"This is all part of either a depopulation or eugenics scam to reduce the population in the ways of minions such as rockefeller and kissinger, releasing these deadly viruses through the very vaccines themselves. This healthcare bill is steering us dead on with a global currency and global gov, as this will destroy our ailing economy even more. Destroyed be design? Or just a mistake by introducing this horrendous costly bill? You decide."
http://www.youtube.com/NsaneSk8er007

Ten things you're not supposed to know about the swine flu vaccine
(At least, not by anyone in authority...)

#1 - The vaccine production was "rushed" and the vaccine has never been tested on humans. Do you like to play guinea pig for Big Pharma? If so, line up for your swine flu vaccine this fall...

#2 - Swine flu vaccines contain dangerous adjuvants that cause an inflammatory response in the body. This is why they are suspected of causing autism and other neurological disorders.

#3 - The swine flu vaccine could actually increase your risk of death from swine flu by altering (or suppressing) your immune system response. There is zero evidence that even seasonal flu shots offer any meaningful protection for people who take the jabs. Vaccines are the snake oil of modern medicine.

#4 - Doctors still don't know why the 1976 swine flu vaccines paralyzed so many people. And that means they really have no clue whether the upcoming vaccine might cause the same devastating side effects. (And they're not testing it, either...)

#5 - Even if the swine flu vaccine kills you, the drug companies aren't responsible. The U.S. government has granted drug companies complete immunity against vaccine product liability. Thanks to that blanket immunity, drug companies have no incentive to make safe vaccines, because they only get paid based on quantity, not safety (zero liability).

#6 - No swine flu vaccine works as well as vitamin D to protect you from influenza. That's an inconvenient scientific fact that the U.S. government, the FDA and Big Pharma hope the people never realize.

#7 - Even if the swine flu vaccine actually works, mathematically speaking if everyone else around you gets the vaccine, you don't need one! (Because it can't spread through the population you hang with.) So even if you believe in the vaccine, all you need to do is encourage your friends to go get vaccinated...

#8 - Drug companies are making billions of dollars from the production of swine flu vaccines. That money comes out of your pocket -- even if you don't get the jab -- because it's all paid by the taxpayers.

#9 - When people start dying in larger numbers from the swine flu, rest assured that many of them will be the very people who got the swine flu vaccine. Doctors will explain this away with their typical Big Pharma logic: "The number saved is far greater than the number lost." Of course, the number "saved" is entirely fictional... imaginary... and exists only in their own warped heads.

#10 - The swine flu vaccine centers that will crop up all over the world in the coming months aren't completely useless: They will provide an easy way to identify large groups of really stupid people. (Too bad there isn't some sort of blue dye that we could tag 'em with for future reference...)

The lottery, they say, is a tax on people who can't do math. Similarly, flu vaccines are a tax on people who don't understand health.

Bank of England to increase counterfeiting

Going to inject more worthless paper into the economy and further devalue the cash already in circulation.

The decision by the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) to increase the scale of the unprecedented programme of printing money, or quantitative easing, from £125bn to £175bn was consented to by Alistair Darling, the Chancellor of the Exchequer.

Call it what you wish, they are simply flooding the market with toilet paper. Actually, that’s a lie, toilet paper has value. It is bought by cash that is earned through labour. You know, you work for a week, get paid, that money represents a week of your working life. Same if a house is built and sold, the resulting cash created represents the collective labour, materials and profit involved in the transaction. Money is supposed to be one side of a coin (pun intended), the other side being production.

If the Wank of England just creates billions out of thin air and throws it into circulation what happens? Supply and demand happens, that’s what. If there was an infinite amount of cash then it would be utterly worthless. You would be better off using toilet paper to buy things with. Another example is diamonds, or oil. If you deliberately control (restrict) the supply and demand is static or increases it will force the value of the commodity up. That is what De Beers and OPEC do and is much easier to achieve when a monopoly/ oligopoly exists. Works the other way too. Increase the supply at a higher rate than demand and the value drops.

Now, this is just a simplified example but the principle is the same. Let’s say you earn £100,000 in a year, expenses are charged to some poor fucking idiots who let you get away with it (name this occupation). You bank the whole wedge. There is a ‘recession’ and the central bank starts flooding the economy with production-lite money. It devalues the cash in your account but it doesn’t manifest in a drop of account value, but an increase in the prices of everything else (as its buying power has decreased). Think of it like pushing weights. One month you push a certain amount with ease, but when you go back a few months later you find it much harder to push. It is the same weight, but you’ve gotten weaker due to a ‘dilution’ of your training regimen. Same thing.

Now, for the sake of simplicity let us say that your £100,000 back then can now only buy £90,000 worth of stuff today. Unlike others, you didn’t sell your Sterling for a more stable currency on the announcements of ‘quantitative easing’. This can manifest as the pound dropping against other currencies. When the pound drops, what that means is the value of your pound in your pocket falls in relation to other currencies.

Anyway you have lost £10,000 of buying power. Even if you stuck it under you mattress it would have still happened. But it gets better! Remember that the money you earn is a direct result of your labour and time you invested in it, the value of your production. £10,000 of it has now vanished. That is 10% of your working year gone. If you worked 300 days that year, it means you lost 30 of them (10%). The Bank of England literally stole them off of you. This is why inflation is a tax, and it does not take into account the burden on the taxpayer from the state spending and debt that already exists;

This year’s Tax Freedom Day, the date when we finish paying our tax burden for the year, was May 14 - the earliest since 1973. However, economists say that government deficits are really a form of deferred taxation and when government borrowing is factored in this momentous date does not fall until June 25 - the latest since 1984.

The average taxpayer is now working more than half the year on behalf of the Government and with each year that goes by this date gets later. In 2008 it fell on 15 June but in 2009 it will take 10 days longer before you start to earn any money for yourself.

So it is a fact that over half of your working life is served as a slave to the state (or that it owns a +50% stake in your production capacity). Interpret that as you will, but I see it as the government/ BOE having a controlling interest over you, and this is just for the people who are actually working!

So let’s add a few more points and summarise. The BOE is holding interest rates to the floor so people cannot earn anything on their savings, then inflating the money supply, reducing their savings, then the state is spending so much of your money that you are enslaved to it for over half the year. I do believe the BOE easing amounts to £5000 a second;

The Chancellor was lent £13billion in June - the highest ever for the month - bringing his borrowing for the financial year so far to £41.2billion, more than the defence budget.

That makes 2009/10 the fourth worst year in history for Government borrowing, even though it is only three months old. Borrowing to date has only been exceeded in an entire 12 months by last year, and the three years in 1992 to 1995.

Yes, more debt for the BOE and IMF to control us with, just what the internationalist financiers want, using the same techniques the Rothschilds used to take control of the BOE in 1825. And to top it all off, the government has had their accounts ‘qualified’.

Alistair Darling was embarrassed today when the Treasury's accounts were qualified for the first time in its 350-year history.

Moreover, after a huge rise in fraud and error in the tax credits system, auditors also qualified the accounts for HM Revenue & Customs and the Department for Work and Pensions.

When accounts are qualified it means auditors signify they have questioned information in them and disagree with the audited body's management.

This is quite simply wholesale looting of the British people, stealing real assets and replacing them with debt and worthless paper. I don’t know what else to say…

‘Secure’ ID card – cloned and altered in 12 minutes

Laurie is holding one of 51,000 ID cards issued by the Home Office to foreign nationals currently working or studying in Britain.

It is similar to the ID card for British citizens unveiled last week by Alan Johnson, the Home Secretary, as part of the Government's ongoing National Identity Scheme.

Embedded inside the card for foreigners is a microchip with the details of its bearer held in electronic form: name, date of birth, physical characteristics, fingerprints and so on, together with other information such as immigration status and whether the holder is entitled to State benefits.

This chip is the vital security measure that, so the Government believes, will make identity cards 'unforgeable'.

The same technology in the ‘new, improved’ Passports by the way.

But as I watch, Laurie picks up a mobile phone and, using just the handset and a laptop computer, electronically copies the ID card microchip and all its information in a matter of minutes.

He then creates a cloned card, and with a little help from another technology expert, he changes all the information the card contains - the physical details of the bearer, name, fingerprints and so on. And he doesn't stop there.

With a few more keystrokes on his computer, Laurie changes the cloned card so that whereas the original card holder was not entitled to benefits, the cloned chip now reads 'Entitled to benefits'.

As a chilling twist, he adds a message that would be visible to any police officer or security official who scanned the card: 'I am a terrorist - shoot on sight.'

I bet you didn’t know the ID card contains these sort of options, did you?

More disturbing still, it could be used to cover the tracks of terrorists planning atrocities on British or foreign soil. By any sensible measure, his demonstration, as part of a special Mail investigation, should be the final nail in the coffin of the Government's £5.4-billion ID scheme.

I doubt it. They are in bed with too many corporations with data mining contracts and are bound by the EU Laws concerning ID cards, which the government tries to deny. Also connected are the new Passports and EU Directive 95/46/EC.

There is also a bigger picture to this. In true Fabian fashion, nations all over the world are implementing centralised digital population registers, especially in the EU. (All nations being bound by EU Law). The issue is ownership. The government is essentially taking ownership of these (over) 50 points of data off of you, and imposing upon you the obligation to constantly update their database, else you risk a £1000 fine. For you own information. On their computers. On top of that, recently a Royal Courts of Justice ruling has set a disgustingly totalitarian precedent;

It would mean any civil/public servant and/or offices of the civil service could commit any act of wilful negligence without fear of legal action and with absolute impunity.

Imagine. A centralised collection of the most critical, important information that exists for you to interact with society. Forced together in one place (would you put your PIN with your credit card?) and that will be accessible by millions of civil servants, private businesses and even other countries.

On top of all that, is the inevitable lax in integrity-checking that is bound to occur with these new fangled super-duper ID cards. Incompetent (and unaccountable) civil servants will assume the technology is perfect, and not pay as much attention. Anyway, there is absolutely no reason why the government should assume central authority over such data. Unless it wants to position itself as the All-Seeing-Eye of all transactions.

Fuck the government. Put that in your fucking database you bunch of fascist cunts.

Swine Flu scaremongering will net Glaxo almost £2bn

CHER CHING!

UK DRUG manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline is set to make more than £1.8 billion from its swine flu vaccine.

A further nine countries have ordered the 96 million doses in the past month, pushing orders beyond 290m as governments prepare for a possible "flu season" in the autumn.
The first supplies will be distributed next month. Glaxo has earmarked 20 per cent of the vaccine output from its Canadian manufacturing unit for poorer countries.

Fellow drug maker Novartis has started trials on its own vaccine, while Sanofi-Aventis expects to follow within days.

They better get their shitty little vaccines on the bandwagon, lots of money to be made spreading a disease,  scaring the shit out of peasants and them selling them a panacea…

Problem – reaction – solution.

Infantilism in the MSM

The Daily Fail begins the article like this:

Why celebrities are to blame for women risking their lives in sunbed salons to look tanned

Now, regardless of the idiocy of women literally cooking themselves in these stupid little places for vanity, just how are celebrities to blame?

Are these individuals in the public eye responsible for the behaviour of these people not in the public eye? Are these women capable of independent thought or are they mindless drones who have no personal responsibility over their own lives?

They have become a society of limp-wristed snivelling little pussies.

This is happening all the time in the media. With drug abuse, tanning booths, financial scams etc, criminal scumbags. It is always someone else’s fault. No one is willing to accept the consequences of their own actions, because guess what? The nanny state has done its best to remove responsibility from its cattle. Wouldn’t want them kicking out when it’s time to milk them now would they…

You see, breaking the connection between action and consequence means people can no longer develop the ability to perceive risk. This is already happening with cotton-wool children.

There is a deeper more sinister angle to this also. To control your own perception of reality though true interactions with it is power. You develop the ability to deal with life in your own way, you naturally become independent. The oppressive state HATES THIS. With this blame culture, along with the rampant Health and Safety quangocracy there is a constant gathering of this decision making power away from the individual into the state, the consequence being that people become ever more dependent on the state for safety from reality.

Consider the example of a parent who deliberately shields a child from the outside world, in order to remain his/ her only means of interacting with it. The parent becomes the gatekeeper of all decisions. Same thing is happening with the state.

Doesn’t sound quite so healthy now does it?

On an ever deeper level this imposed culture of refusing to acknowledge personal responsibility is also a consequence of the state wishing to utterly abolish private property rights, the most valuable and sacred of which is the property of your body and time. In the same why you cannot blame an automaton for the actions your programmed it with, people are being encouraged to accept that the state is the regulator of all thought and action, essentially taking ownership of your mind and body. For your protection of course.

The ownership of self is the absolute starting point of all freedoms. Without it you are not even a slave, you simply cease to exist as an individual, like an ant in a hive.

I guess this smudging of responsibility is something along the lines of ‘leading beyond authority’. Blaming beyond yourself you can call it.

Sheesh, how did the human race ever survive before the Socialists were excreted from the bowels of the human condition…

UK Gov spends half a billion pounds on propaganda

"Labour – lightening your wallets to correct your thinking." They can have that for free, so long as they stick it up their arse.

Ave some of that, you peasants..

The cost of Government spin leapt by 43 per cent last year, figures show.

More than £540million was spent on advertising and marketing in the year to March, despite the deepening recession.

The huge rise was last night blamed on the cost of high profile 'nanny state' campaigns to tackle obesity, smoking and climate change.

Official figures, slipped out as MPs concentrated on the swine flu epidemic, showed spending on television, press and radio advertising grew by 35 per cent to £211million.

Digital marketing, which includes the internet, soared by 84 per cent to £40million.

Other costs included 'news and PR', which rose by 52 per cent to £40.9million, while live events to spread government messages nearly trebled to £34.3million.

Just proves the position of government as the self-imposed ‘morality/ health/ thought police’ of the people. It gets worse:

Mark Lund, the chief executive of the Central Office of Information, which co-ordinates government advertising, marketing and communications, said: ' Government campaigns can help save lives and save money.

I beg your pardon?

And also prop up other parts of the economy using taxpayers money. But this next line SAYS IT ALL.

'Changing behaviour is difficult but the benefits to the taxpayer and society can repay the investment many times over.'

Changing how you think, bringing you into line with the wise, superior thoughts of the Righteous. Can’t help remembering what another Righteous said, see if you can recognise it;

Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way round, to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise.

Failed asylum seekers still ‘entitled’ to your money – UK Gov

Cultural Attaché from Eastern Europe.

Tens of thousands of failed asylum seekers will get free care on the cash-strapped NHS following a Government U-turn, it was announced today.

At present, people are denied free treatment on the Health Service if their asylum bid has been turned down and they still have not left the country.

But now the Department of Health has decided that if they are destitute or cannot return home 'through no fault of their own', they will be entitled to free care at GP surgeries and hospitals.

It potentially increases the numbers able to legally use the NHS by tens of thousands - although Migration Watch said the relaxed rules would open the floodgates to 'up to a million' illegal immigrants.

So, people who do not even qualify to set foot in Britain are still ‘entitled’ to the free treatment under the bloated, corrupt, Common Purpose infested NHS (National Death Service). Except of course that it isn’t free. YOU PAY. How’s that for ‘social inclusion’?

Enjoy your higher taxes and reduced freedoms to fund the socialists utopia. Even better, vote for them again! That why you have no FUCKING excuse when this country is finally abolished in favour of the EU dream.

You mugs.

I think it’s time to join the Libertarian Party.