Chief Climate-Scam Salesman 'we're talking shit, and WHAT bitches!'

Dr Rajendra Pachauri, the chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), has been under fire since a report from the charity the WWF was used to make claims about reductions in ice on mountains.

In particular it included the erroneous claim that the Himalayan glaciers would melt by 2035. It was said to be 300 years out and led to accusations that the organisation was cherry-picking evidence to justify its claims.

Comes as no surprise to those who haven't forgotten the 'we need to do whatever it takes to scare people into believing us' quotes from the IPCC.

In a hearing at the InterAcademy Council, an organisation of the world's science academies which is conducting an independent review of the processes and procedures of the IPCC, Dr Pachauri described the inclusion of the glacier claim as "human failure" which should not have happened.

What is he saying, that humans can fuck things up! Like build dodgy computer models and cook books! Amazing, never knew that.

But the IPCC's chairman said there was a need to use information which was not from peer-reviewed scientific journals, because in some places that was the only research that had been done.

He said the media and other sections of society had misunderstood the role of such information, labelling it grey literature, "as if it was some form of grey muddied water flowing down the drains".

Well, I'm no scientist, but if data cannot be checked for objectivity, integrity, transparency etc, then it hardly qualifies as conclusive does it? I thought that was the whole point of the Scientific Method.

This 'man-evil-killing-gaia' scam has trillions of potential dollars (and the world's private property) attached to it. How's that for motive for talking shit.

Consent must be given, it is never assumed

So there I was, thinking about the logic of the title statement. If a door to a house is open, does that mean you have consent to enter it? If a car boot is open, does that automatically mean you can help yourself to whatever is in it?

Of course not. This is one of the foundational pillars of a private property based society (i.e, a free society). Consent must be given. Now it should come as no surprise that the ever growing state seems to think it is above this basic rule (although nobody gave them consent to it). This little fact on its own should convince any and everyone that a revolution is needed. In a democracy the consent of the majority can override that of the minority. The truth is, there is no majority or minority. These are collectivist conveniences. There are only individuals. Only in a totalitarian, Marxist-style system can anyone (or group) demand the stripping of private property from another. Perfect for the ‘abolish private property’ mantra of collectivist ideologies such as socialism, communism, feminism and environmentalism.

I am about to opt out of this NHS corporate data mining project, called Summary Care Records. I have to opt out, because apparently the state was already decided that I want to opt in. They didn’t ask me obviously. Just like they didn’t ask me about bailing out banks and charging me the bill (illegal), going to war in the Middle East (illegal) and so on.

Consent is important, so are ‘rights’. They, like sunlight from the sun, are consequences of ownership. Simply put, you only have rights (consent is one) over things you own (such as yourself). Things you don’t own you have no rights over.

Simple isn’t it.

I don’t have the legal right to give you consent to enter someone else’s home and start eating out their fridge, any more than I can’t give you consent to have sex with that girl over there.

This applies to absolutely everyone. No one is exempt. It is the Great Equaliser. Socialist constructs like The Human Rights Act are not only disruptive to this logic, it is illegal (I’ll deal with this in another post). We are all equal in our rights over our own property and equally powerless over anyone else’s. Society, (from the beggar all the way up to the government) is composed of individuals. ‘Government’ doesn’t exist as a real thing, it is a virtual object that describes a group of individuals, nothing more. As such, the government should have no rights to assume consent of your property (your medical data, your organs or whatever).

They can’t do this because they don’t own you, right? I mean, if they did then you would be a slave in every meaning of the word. If they owned you, they would be able take money directly out of your pay check before you even get it. They could fine you arbitrarily, stop you from gathering as free people and protesting, ignore you when you actively reject government proposals, sell your private data to corporations, shoot you in the head because you ‘don’t look right’, pass laws purely for the purpose of taking more of your money, call you all racists and bigots for asking questions about changes in your local area, they can even sign you up to legal contracts so foreigners can tell you how you live your life and charge you hundreds of billions while they do it and even give voting rights to people who aren’t British. They could take the currency you have to use as payment for the use of your property (body) for production (provision of goods and services) and deliberately devalue it. They could borrow money from private banks that charge interest and demand you pay it.

Wait a minute…

May 20 Everybody Draw muhammad Day

JIHADWATCH

The paintbrush/pen/pencil/crayon is mightier than the sword. Or hey, even needlepoint if you're up for it. The possibilities are endless. "Seattle cartoonist launches 'Everybody Draw Mohammed Day'," by Jamie Griswold for the Associated Press, April 23 (thanks to all who sent this in):

After Comedy Central cut a portion of a South Park episode following a death threat from a radical Muslim group, Seattle cartoonist Molly Norris wanted to counter the fear. She has declared May 20th "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day."

Norris told KIRO Radio's Dave Ross that cartoonists are meant to challenge the lines of political correctness. "That's a cartoonist's job, to be non-PC."

Producers of South Park said Thursday that Comedy Central removed a speech about intimidation and fear from their show after a radical Muslim group warned that they could be killed for insulting the Prophet Muhammad.

The group said it wasn't threatening South Park producers Trey Parker and Matt Stone, but it included a gruesome picture of Theo Van Gogh, a Dutch filmmaker killed by a Muslim extremist in 2004, and said the producers could meet the same fate. The website posted the addresses of Comedy Central's New York office and the California production studio where South Park is made.

"As a cartoonist I just felt so much passion about what had happened I wanted to kind of counter Comedy Central's message they sent about feeling afraid," Norris said.

Norris has asked other artists to submit drawings of any religious figure to be posted as part of Citizens Against Citizens Against Humor (CACAH) on May 20th.

But drawings of one "religious figure" in particular will provoke death threats and accusations of hatred and racism.

On her website Norris explains this is not meant to disrespect any religion, but rather meant to protect people's right to express themselves.

How should I vote in the General Election 2010?

Interesting little widget thing on the Telegraph site, didn't like the phrasing of some of the questions, but it's corporate media, never expect too much. Apparently my views are closest to UKIP.

Funny that.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7541285/How-should-I-vote-in-the-General-Election-2010.html

Invisible Empire - Full documentary

Jason Bermas presents Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined produced by Alex Jones.

View the video on Youtube here.

EUISS and World Governance: We Need Immigration and Climate Change As Arguments for Military World State Control

Summary: The EU Institute for Security Studies (EUISS) is the brain behind the EU's military. It is centered around Bilderberger and Club of Rome member, Javier Solana, former NATO Secretary General and EU foreign minister (High Representative). EUISS' annual publication 2009: "What ambitions for European defence in 2020", contains interesting information: Swedish Tomas Ries writes that the ISS needs a European army to defend EU borders against massive poverty immigration. He calls it distasteful and immoral - but necessary!

Furthermore, Ries writes that Europe needs to be able to wage war against countries (including Russia) with other views on the world than the EU's New World Order views. Furthermore, this New World Order will usurp the right of deciding to occupy an area of a former sovereign state in the name of, e.g. climate or biodiversity! Nevertheless, the EU has started to fulfill its promise of free movement within the EU for Muslim Euro-Mediterranean partners, as promised in 2003.

Furthermore, the EU has set up recruiting offices in Africa to recruit 56 million. Muslims + their families into the EU by 2050! At the same time, the EUISS writes in the report from its annual congress 2009, "Soft power". Managing a Post-crisis World", that it would be wrong to bar the Union from the outside world, because it is contrary to the sacred dogma of "unity in diversity." But then comes the strange thing: It is stated, that there is no risk of confrontation between the great powers - for they are partners. Why else does the European Union want an army, then?

Regionalization, it is said, is part of global governance. The Global Agenda (21) is generated by the linkage of the fight against the crises (climate, financial, immigration, development) - that the elite behind the New World Order has created itself for this very purpose. The G20 must be strengthened - and bought NGOs must have much more to say in support of the New World Order program - because this is New World Order "legitimacy". Better is soft power - but make no mistake. The EU will put hard power behind if it does not succeed by soft means. The British Defence Ministry wrote that everybody must be linked to a verifiable network (chips, among others) - and it will be deemed suspicious to stay outside. It stipulated that it will be difficult for those who want to preserve their indigenous culture and beliefs. They will be considered radicalised - while this is obviously not true, for example of Muslim "neo-Europeans". The UN has started to realize John F. Kennedy 's proposal from 1961 to abolish all armies and only maintain a UN world army of 50,000 men to oppress troublemakers against the New World Order. The NATO has usurped this role in 2008.

FULL ARTICLE HERE

Call for Civil Disobedience - a worldwide strike by the oppressed

The blogosphere and meeting places have been alight with anger, outrage, frustration. And questions about how to defeat our tyrannical 'masters' that make our lives a living hell.
Gandhi found non-compliance to be an effective tool to defeat his masters. And he was just one man.

Imagine what we could achieve, if we made a concerted effort, for a given number of days.

The fact is, the corporations want our money. The government needs our money. The 'mainstream' media are the mouthpieces of these monsters. And all of them are the cause of our misery.
If we starve them of it for a spell, how would that affect them?

We've lost the ability to think for ourselves because we've been programmed not to. If we cease to tune into their propaganda and instead, explore the alternative media, we see a different picture from the one they want us to see. We think for ourselves and join up the dots.

We have been little short of terrorised by their scare stories, their unwarranted use of and threat of force, their fines, their toxic products, their lies - to do their dirty bidding. They enrich themselves at our expense. Every time.

The Greeks and the Icelanders have woken up and taken action. The tyranny we face is on a par with theirs, if not greater, and yet we do bugger all about it. Our MPs don't give a jot - they're not listening to us. They're listening to their party whips, as they eye that juicy job within their grasp if they ignore us. So they do.

So let's learn from the Greeks, the Icelanders, Gandhi - and make our 'strike' international. After all, the entire civilised world is facing tyranny simultaneously.

And as Old Holborn says, we outnumber them. They cannot afford non-compliance on such a massive scale. Success frequently starts from small beginnings, as American patriots will tell you. As Gandhi demonstrated.

Visit the original post on Fausty Writes for full info and updates. I’m going to do this. It is time WE actually started doing things as opposed to just writing about these globalist bastards.

It is to occur April 15-18.

Global warming continues unabated

Washington DC prepares to shut down for massive snowfall dubbed "snowpocalypse"

LOL

Climate Change hysteria through the ages

H/T Old Holborn

You put the temperature up, put the temperature down, in out up down shake it all about, you do the hoke-coke and you give us all your taxes, that's what it's all about!

Past Climate Change Beliefs

State propaganda

Stop smoking. Drink less. Learn new skills. Stop defrauding the benefit office. Claim tax credits. Wear a condom. Join the Army.

Britons are being bombarded by more than 10,000 government advertisements every day, prompting accusations that Labour is creating the "ultimate nanny state".

Messages from the state were relayed to the population via television, radio, cinema, newspapers, magazines and billboards on more than 3.7 million occasions during 2008, according to new research by media analysts at The Nielsen Company.

Current major campaigns include the Department of Health's "Condom – Essential Wear" campaign to promote safe sex, a police initiative to publicise the Anti-Terrorist Hotline, and the Department for Transport's "Think! Bike" campaign to encourage drivers to look out for motorcyclists.

The government is now the biggest spender on advertising in the country.

Its spending has increased by 20 per cent this year to more than £400 million at a time when the previous biggest spender, the corporate giant Procter & Gamble, has been cutting back.

Almost half a bil to tell the peasants how to think and act. Free nation my arse. Let us not forget the quangocracy and the fake charities. Billions of your money, taken off of you without your consent and used to brainwash you.

Fuck the government. They shouldn't even have an advertising budget, their job is to administer the law and protect property rights, the rest can be done by local governments and the people.

This is also an opportunity for me to post this webpage regarding psywar using the corporate media as a vector.

BRAINWASHING: How The British Use The Media for Mass Psychological Warfare

"I know the secret of making the average American believe anything I want him to. Just let me control television.... You put something on the television and it becomes reality. If the world outside the TV set contradicts the images, people start trying to change the world to make it like the TV set images....'' --Hal Becker, media ``expert'' and management consultant, the Futures Group, in an interview in 1981

Ten Years On: Britain Without the European Union

I got it free from the Taxpayer Alliance email but it is only £5.99 anyway. Get it (and more) from the greateudebate.com

I started making notes to post quotes, but I would end up typing up 50% of the book. Going through numbers, billions of pounds here, billions there, just flowing out the pockets of the People of Britain, people who earn it through sweat and toil, only to be pissed away on greasing the palms of poor countries and buying off politicians, setting up quangos and throwing money at media to promote the 'correct way of thinking about the EU', usual behaviour of a corrupt regime.

Do not think about the fact that individual freedom is the blood cell of a healthy, free society, and that the EU is the opposite of that. Putting aside the corrupt money flows, whereby the accounts of the EU haven't been signed off for 15 years or more, or the historical connection between the EEC cum EU and the Nazi 'Fourth Reich' plan, or the complete lack of democratic accountability and the blatant and consistent disregard for you view or the consequences of their decisions upon your life. Just put aside the 100,000+ pages of rules and diktats the EU has created to 'regulate' your life ad infinitum, even though simple logic would dictate that the more laws you have, the less free you are, seeing as rules and laws cannot add to freedom (freedom is an absence of law). Think about that, (in gross payments) we have been forced (because we didn't consent) into giving the EU approx a quarter of a trillion pounds of YOUR money, so you can be told what you can or cannot do, lest you be forced to pay them even more. The benefits of the EU are?

In every decision in life, whether you realise it or not, you carry out a risk-benefit assessment. Is going up to that girl at the bar worth the potential date later? The cost of that van worth the potential extra business? Think about how the EU benefits you. Forget their waffle, the expensive leaflets and propaganda. Try and think how paying the EU over £12,300 per minute, 24/7 year in, year out, benefits you. Compare it to how much you think it would benefit you by not paying it, and by not being told what to do.

I did say the book was short, I read it in a matter of hours without hardly trying. Unfortunately most people under the age of 18 can't read, but for those who can, get a copy.

I have picked a quote from the book, I think this sums up the EU nicely.

"Britain is paying a premium to belong to a gym that beats it up" - Ten Years On, pg 73 (Paraphrased)

They have been pummeling the Great British Bulldog for decades, trying to push us down to the level of lower nations, in true global communist fashion. Drugging it with media and celebrity nonsense, smoke and mirrors with the corrupted Parliament, sucking out its life blood, shutting down production, stripping away ancient freedoms and so on. Just trying to weaken this Animal of Freedom so they can get close enough to skin it, and harvest its organs.

But guess what. Britain is still here. Everybody I know is pissed off with the government. All it takes it explaining to people what is going on so they can connect the dots, and that is beginning to happen.

Indeed, I think that Bulldog is beginning to stir. Its ear flicked and it has opened an eye. It can see that it is surrounded by enemies, red, blue and green feathers on yellow bodies, circling like vultures, all wanting a piece of the Prize Pooch. The oldest and most illustrious of democracies.

Once it is full awake, it is game over for these spineless, slithering snakes.

2010 is going to be very interesting.

Bono: U2 album was too clever for fans?

What a prick.

Bono has admitted that he is disappointed with the lack of success for U2's recent album.

No Line On The Horizon was a number one album, but single 'Get On Your Boots' peaked at number 12 in the single charts and 'I'll Go Crazy If I Don't Go Crazy Tonight' only reached number 32.

According to The Mirror, Bono is unhappy that the band didn't "pull off the pop songs".

He explained: "We weren't really in that mindset and we felt that the album was kind of an almost extinct species, and we should approach it in totality and create a mood and a feeling, and a beginning, middle and end."

The frontman added that the record might have been too complex for fans.

"I suppose we've made a work that is a bit challenging for people who have grown up on a diet of popstars," he said.

Maybe it is because you're an overrated band, and people are sick and tired of your duplicity. Prancing around the world telling them to stop using energy that is better utilised in your private jets and elitist buddies' mansions. But no, they have such an inflated view of themselves that the 'fans' must be thick, unable to comprehend the higher power that is Bono.

No you creepy crawly scumbag. You're crap. Fuck off back to your tax haven and stop trying to tell the peasantry how to live. The only fucking reason you have had the attention you have had is because of your elite-agenda worship in the first place.

Every internet click to be monitored by the state

At a cost of £380 per minute. Of your money, being used to spy on you.

An astonishing £380 a minute will be spent on surveillance in a massive expansion of the Big Brother state.

The £200million-a-year sum will give officials access to details of every internet click made by every citizen - on top of the email and telephone records already available.

It is a 1,700 per cent increase on the cost of the current surveillance regime.

Last night LibDem home affairs spokesman Chris Huhne described the sum as 'eye-watering'.

'There is already enough concern at the level of Government snooping,' he said.

'In an era of tough spending choices, it cannot be a justified response to the problems we face as a country to lavish millions of pounds a year on state spying.

'The increase in money spent on tapping phones and emails is all the more baffling when Britain is still one of the few countries not to allow intercept evidence in court, even in terrorist cases.'

What about that EU extradition law? Allowing countries to drag people from one country to another, and try them under their own laws?

State bodies including councils are already making one request every minute to spy on the phone records and email accounts of members of the public.

The number of snooping missions carried out by police, town halls and other government departments has rocketed by 44 per cent in two years to a rate of 1,381 new cases every day.

Ministers say the five-year cost of the existing regime is £55.61million, an average of £11million a year.

This is paid to phone companies and service providers to meet the cost of keeping and providing private information about customers.

A cost imposed by guess who, THE EU! Try Directive 2006/24/EC; on retaining data generated through electronic communications or public communications networks. You can view the original on the EUR-Lex, here.

The cost of the new system emerged in a series of Parliamentary answers.

It is to cover payments to internet service providers so they can store mountains of information about every customer for a minimum of 12 months, and set up new systems to cope.

The actual content of calls and emails is not be kept - only who they were from or to, when they took place and where they were sent from.

Well that can change. This can only get more intrusive and pervasive.

Police, security services and other public authorities can then request access to the data as part of investigations.

Some 653 bodies are currently allowed access, including councils, the Financial Services Authority, the Ambulance Service and fire authorities and prison governors.

So, they take your information, your personal data, formally just between you and your telco, and share it among millions of public sector workers and across the EU.

And they have the fucking audacity to try and shame people into accepting it with the 'nothing to hide, nothing to fear' speech.

Well I have something to fear from having my information, from DNA to internet clicks, shared among millions. Would you prefer one copy of your passport, in your safekeeping, or millions of copies made and distributed to fuck knows where to be seen by fuck knows who? And this is to fight crime, bullshit. The police are looking to spend millions of handheld DNA, iris scanners (of our money remember) and tell assaulted girls there is no money to take DNA samples.

The new rules allowing access to internet records will be introduced by Parliament before the end of the year.

They are known as the Intercept Modernisation Programme.

They should call it the 'EU Slave Database', much better ring to it.

Ministers had originally wanted to store the information on a massive Government-run database, but chose not to because of privacy concerns.

Yesterday Alex Deane, director of campaign group Big Brother Watch, said: 'The Government is preparing to make British people pay through the nose so that they can track our movements online.'

But a Home Office spokesman said the costs involved were entirely separate from those necessary to comply with the European Data Retention Directive, which requires the storage of phone and email records.

So how much does the EU cost then Is that part of the £40 million a day it is already costing us?

'Communications data is crucial to the fight against crime and keeping people safe,' he added.

The only person you can really count on to keep you safe is yourself. Not the state. We all the police have been made impotent, not that it is even physically impossible for them to prevent crimes before they happen. Only the 'victim' can do that.

'We have made clear that there are no plans to collect and hold the content of everyone's communications.'

Not yet.

Fabians pride themselves on 'incremental warfare.' Slowly, step by step, they enact their plans against Britain. This is yet another.

There were 504,073 made last year to intercept email and telephone records under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act. It was passed ostensibly to fight terrorism.

But it has been used to spy on people suspected of putting their bins out on the wrong day, dropping litter and attempting to cheat school catchment area rules.

Incremental warfare. This is also called 'function creep' in the IT world.

This government needs to be utterly destroyed and the neo Communists, the Communitarians, hung from lamp posts on London Bridge. The new sticks to beat freedom out of the population are now 'terrorism' and 'climate change'. Oh man we so need a revolution!

Here's another phoney war: the one on climate change

More level-headedness from the mainstream media.

Dominic Lawson: Here's another phoney war: the one on climate change

There's no glory in spending $10m a year on giant nozzles that squirt sulphur dioxide.

Now Levitt and Dubner are launching the follow up to Freakonomics – but this time it is conventional left-liberal thought which will be outraged by their assertions. A clue is given in the work's full title, Superfreakonomics: Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance. Yes, the authors have this time addressed their dispassionate intellectual blowtorch to the conventional wisdom about climate change, its causes and remedies.

In this investigation they have called upon a number of experts with relevant expertise, including Nathan Myhrvold, a former colleague of Professor Stephen Hawking at Cambridge, who went on to become Bill Gates' futurist-in-chief at Microsoft; and Ken Caldeira, an ecologist from Stanford University and contributor to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Caldeira points out that if our concern is for the planet, and if we choose to measure that concern by biodiversity, then increases in carbon dioxide can be a positive benefit. A rise in atmospheric CO2 means that plants need less by way of water for their growth; Caldera's study demonstrated that doubling the amount of carbon dioxide, while holding steady all other inputs, such as water and nutrients, yielded a 70 per cent increase in plant growth. This would not come remotely as a surprise to people of my generation, who were taught at school that carbon dioxide was the lifeblood of plants, but will perhaps be a shock to the present generation of schoolchildren who are being lectured that man-made CO2 is tantamount to poison.

Time Out Cover - unknown date

No it bloody well isn't!

EU Preparing for Armed Gendarmerie Against Treaty-disobedient Populations

EuroMed

Summary: First a video with Barroso's nervous speech to the masterminds of the EU - the Council on Foreign Relations. Sweden wants an answer as to why EUFOR soldiers are not being used more outside the EU - has even created a Nordic Battlegroup whom Sweden wants to use! Two exercises have been held in Sweden, where EUFOR as the Southern Liberation Army was to defeat a Nordic National League for the benefit of Southeners! Since 2006, there is now a European Gendarmerie Force, consisting of armed combat troops in police uniforms. They are the Sturmabteilung (SA) of the New World Order. The gendarmerie is primarily under the EU, but may be ordered to be deployed anywhere by the UN, NATO, OSCE and other international organizations. They are to be deployed in expected unrests and civil wars (against Muslims?) in countries under the Treaty of Lisbon - as well as against countries that do not want to join it. Gendarms from outside will be sent to a rebellious country, lest they should stick at shooting into demonstrations and at others, which they are entitled to, after death penalty is reintroduced with the Treaty of Lisbon (Prof. KA Schachtschneider, German politician, Klaus Buchner). Buchner describes the Lisbon Treaty as a coup d´état. None of the German Bundestag members had seen an authorized version of the Treaty before they voted for it - because the party leadership said they had to!

We have seen that death penalty will be re-introduced in the EU by the Lisbon Treaty, how Mr. Barroso calls the Lisbon Treaty the Treaty for enlargement - and the EU body, the EESC, calls it the Treaty for a common immigration policy (directed from the top) - and Barroso also calls it the Treaty for world governance and EU-aggressive war.
In order to remove any doubt as for who ultimately masterminded the Lisbon Treaty and the EU on the whole, see this video: The errand boy, Jose Barroso, EU Commission President, speaks on 21 Sept. 2009 as nervous as a schoolboy in examination to his masters, the Rockefeller Council on Foreign Relations, who initiated the unification of Europe and still pulls the EU strings through other Rockefeller clubs encompassing EU´s top leaders – including Mr. Barroso.

Ad omnia paratus? (Motto of Northern EU rapid reaction force, meaning: ready for everything)
The coat of arms of the Nordic EU battlegroup is since 2007 depicted as a castrated lion at the request of female Swedish soldiers. The Times: Coats of arms containing lions without genitalia were given to those who betrayed the Crown.”

EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS 8 Sept. 2009 - The Swedish EU presidency wants defence ministers to have a closer look at the bloc's quick response forces, which so far have never been deployed due to a lack of consensus among member states. "The concept of EU battlegroups is good, but they have not been used until now. We want to have a political discussion on why this is the case," Olof Skoog, a diplomat representing the Swedish EU presidency told members of the security and defence committee in the European Parliament on 7 September.

Last year, Stockholm co-ordinated the set-up of the Nordic battle group, comprising 2,800 soldiers mostly from Sweden and also from Finland, Norway, Ireland and Estonia. The endeavour cost Sweden more than €100 million. "We made the investment in order for the battlegroup to be used."

Since January 2007, the EU has in theory always had two battlegroups on call, each comprising at least 1500 combat soldiers.

In Sweden they have had civil war games, where EU´s rapid task force, EUFOR, invades Sweden to fight the "Nordic Nationalist League" (Swedish Home Guard!) on behalf of the good Southeners. In another war game the Nordic Nationalist League was fought by an invasion army of the good Southern Liberation Army alongside of Swedish regular troops around Malmö! (Swedish Army´s link removed!! I previously had the story here - and Altermedia.info had it, too ).

Set up for deployment within 5-10 days, the battlegroups are designed as rapid response forces in emergency situations, when the United Nations or Nato cannot intervene quickly enough. They need the unanimous approval of all EU member states in order to be deployed, which is the main reason why they have not been used so much.

Brussels has set up a new EU police force
The Daily Express 9 Sept. 2007: Critics last night warned that the force could eventually patrol the streets of Britain if Gordon Brown signs up to the new EU constitution, Nigel Farage, leader of the UK Independence Party, described the new force as “sinister”. He said: “It is not at all clear to me why the EU needs its own police force."

Wise Up Journal 16 Sept. 2009 reports what I read on and cut from the following EGF-linked articles, which were then suddenly removed from the internet!!! Nevertheless, I keep the links, as they prove this manipulation and the sensitivity of that gendarmerie. Sometimes, the links work again.

The following is official text from the European Gendarmerie Force ( http://www.eurogendfor.eu/), September 16th 2009: “The European Gendarmerie Force (EGF) is an initiative of 5 EU Member States - France, Italy, The Netherlands, Portugal and Spain – aimed at improving the crisis management capability in sensitive areas. Now the Romanian and Polish Gendarmerie have joined in, too.

“EGF responds to the need to rapidly conduct all the spectrum of civil security actions, either on its own or in parallel with the military intervention. “Based in Vicenza.
“EGF´s goal is to provide the International Community with a valid and operational instrument for crisis management, first and foremost at disposal of EU, but also of other International Organizations, as NATO, UN and OSCE, and ad hoc coalitions. “Turkey joins the European Gendarmerie force as Observer”

“Furthermore, it is excellently suitable for deployment parallel with or immediately after a military operation to maintain public order and safety as well as in situations where local police services are not (sufficiently) deployed.”

International Military Police
The EGF was declared fully operational on 20 July 2006.
Europe de la Defence: It is made of units from the regular armed forces of each member State. Here is a video showing them in action (training). They are very aggressive.

European Gendarmerie Force (EGF) FAQ (http://www.eurogendfor.org/egfpages/faq.aspx#Q1C)
The EGF will possess an initial rapid-reaction capability up to 800 persons within 30 days, that can be reinforced. The rapidly deployable EGF must be able to conduct, amongst others, operations that support the fight against organised crime and also be able to protect participants of other civilian missions.

The total strength of the Force could reach 2300. Usually the mandate will be based on relevant UN Security Council Resolutions or on political guidelines from EU or other international organisations that intervene in the field of crisis management.
The civilian police capabilities … comprise both police services with civilian status and police forces with military status of the gendarmerie type.
Recognising that a number of countries have initiated studies aiming at changing military police forces to gendarmerie-type structures, the EGF is willing to help facilitating institutional changes in other EU Member States.

The Sturm Abteilung of the EU: EuroGendFor The European rapid reaction force for future civil wars.
"At the European level we are already preparing intensively for the counter-insurgency, which - considering the envisaged measures - could certainly assume civil war proportions.” This is according to a report by a usually very reliable informer under the symbol of "EUROGENDFOR (European Gendarmerie Force).

In a crisis situation, the following course of events is expected: 1. the local police are trying to become masters of the situation. If they do not, 2. EUROGENDFOR then comes to their aid – and their forces do not shrink from shooting. This is how they would still avoid the impression that the national army of an EU-country is to shoot at its own citizens. Only if this measure does not show the desired success, 3. the military can be used "to correct". It is also intended to use troops from "friendly" foreign nations to let them shoot at one's own rebellious people.

But it goes even further: The EUROGENDFOR's founding documents also provide for the basic possibility to intervene in EU countries that have not ratified the Treaty of Lisbon or want to leave the"fold". On its use in an emergency, a "war council" consisting essentially of the ministers of defense and of the interior of the participating countries, will decide.

Once the EUROGENDFOR force has become active, the national self-determination of the country concerned is out, all buildings occupied by members of the reaction force are no longer accessible for local authorities. National law will as far as possible be overridden."
Excerpt from the weekly information sheet “Confidential Communications” - from "Politik, Wirtschaft und Geldanlage, No. 3836".

Berliner Umschau 7. Sept. 2009: The head of the German Ecological-Democratic Party, Klaus Buchner, handed a complaint to the German Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe on the Lisbon Treaty. Klaus Buchner:1. The Treaty virtually abolishes our democracy. The eternity clauses are removed by the Treaty of Lisbon. It is a coup d´état. 2.The article 151 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the Union: all social legislation is subject to the condition that the competitiveness of the economy is not disrupted. 3. Coercion to arm and the possibility of wars of aggression. This is explicitly stated about war of oil. It is also expressly stated that in legal suppression of rebellion and insurrection - it is literally in the European Convention on Human Rights - selective killing is allowed. This means that not only is shooting into demonstrations allowed, but people can be taken out and executed.
The basic law remains in force only for so long as it does not contradict any small edict by the EU.

The written form of the consolidated Treaty came only after the vote (in the German Bundestag). The House voted without knowing the contract. I have the testimony of an SPD deputy. He said: “My party leadership has said that the agreement is good, so I agreed.”
To me it was shocking that the military aspects of this Treaty have not been negotiated by the judges. On military aspects was not to be spoken.

But maybe here is hope. The Telegraph 21 Sept. 2009: But the council of ministers will continue to decide foreign policy by consensus, not by qualified majority voting, leaving national governments in the driving seat. In the end, none of these reforms will alter the central fact that member states do not think of themselves as forming a cohesive union.

Comment
This is indeed very sinister. By means of the Lisbon Treaty the cynical New World Order elite is planning to introduce an absolute dictatorship – reintroducing death penalty. If people protest too vigorously, they will be defeated by professional gendarmerie – possibly military forces from other countries not afraid of shooting against their own fellow countrymen. That small countries like Serbia have the New World Order imposed, is an old story. That the EU detached an ancient Serbian province from Serbia and lets the Muslims destroy Christianity there is part of the EU “unity in diversity.”
The EU elite seems to have an itching in the trigger finger – to show the world how big they have grown – and in order to have their share of world governance glory and profit.

The EU builds on 3 policing pillars: 1. The Europol 2. the EU-gendarmerie 3. the Eufor/EDSP. However,other international institutions, e.g. the UN, can order the EGF into action, too.
Klaus Buchner is right: The Frankfurter Allgemeine 5 Oct., 2008: "The Federal Army is to be brought into action within Germany proper in emergencies, and a Constitutional change will be made," said the chairman of the Union´s parliamentary group, Volker Kauder, after a meeting in the coalition committee.
But the necessary “legal” basis for the offensive application outside the EU of these forces is the Lisbon Treaty. And without that treaty they are not allowed to kill us.

But whom do they suspect to turn violent? Us or the Muslims they let in in ever increasing numbers? Ordo ab chao, say the elitists – order out of chaos – but first create chaos!

The Truth about Global Warming stories

Remember this,

"The threat of environmental crisis will be the 'international disaster key' that will unlock the New World Order." [Mikhail Gorbachev, quoted in "A Special Report: The Wildlands Project Unleashes Its War On Mankind", by Marilyn Brannan, Associate Editor, Monetary & Economic Review, 1996, p. 5.]

Everyone knows the term New World Order alludes to a global centralised technocratic super government. Like the EU but global and even worse.

Now this is released.

A United Nations document on “climate change” that will be distributed to a major environmental conclave next week envisions a huge reordering of the world economy, likely involving trillions of dollars in wealth transfer, millions of job losses and gains, new taxes, industrial relocations, new tariffs and subsidies, and complicated payments for greenhouse gas abatement schemes and carbon taxes — all under the supervision of the world body.

This is the main thrust of the climate change scam. Pushing for a supranational legal framework, specifically designed to usurp the sovereignty of nation states but by proxy, the individual sovereignty of us all.

I add the following quotes for your consideration.

David Rockefeller Sept. 23, 1994 "This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long - We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."

Note the image on the right of the blog, of the newspaper.

"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." -David Rockefeller, from his own book, Memoirs.

We are moving toward a new world order, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.” — Mikhail Gorbachev 1987

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto determination practiced in past centuries"--David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991

"The invisible Money Power is working to control and enslave mankind. It financed Communism, Fascism, Marxism, Zionism, Socialism. All of these are directed to making the United States a member of a World Government ..." -- AMERICAN MERCURY MAGAZINE, December 1957, pg. 92.

"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits." — SIR JOSIAH STAMP, (President of the Bank of England in the 1920's, the second richest man in Britain)


“We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” — Statement made before the United States Senate on Feb. 7, 1950 by James Paul Warburg

"I am convinced that the agreement [Bretton Woods] will enthrone a world dictatorship of private finance more complete and terrible than a Hitlerite dream. It offers no solution of world problems, but quite blatantly sets up controls which will reduce the smaller nations to vassal states and make every government the mouthpiece and tool of International Finance. It will undermine and destroy the democratic institutions of this country - in fact as effectively as ever the Fascist forces could have done - and will undoubtedly present a new menace, endangering world peace. World collaboration of private financial interests can only mean mass unemployment, slavery, misery, degradation and financial destruction. -- Labor Minister of Australia, Eddie Ward, during the inception of the World Bank and Bretton Woods, he gave this warning.

All throughout history, tyrants have sought global domination. Our time is no different. The human race struggles against itself, seeking to drag itself away from these primitive insecurities, trying to quench them with never ending power and wealth. As far as Britain is concerned, people should educate themselves on a few things. The nature of money, how banks operate, and if you own yourself or if you are a slave to others. I will elaborate on this shortly.

Make no mistake, running serves no purpose whatsoever. We are born to fight for our freedom against parasites, and by God, this is what I shall do!

France Mulls CO2 Taxes on Citizens

RELATED: German Government Advisor Proposes Personal CO2 Budget For Everyone On Planet

RELATED: Obama Intimately Tied To Carbon Trading Scam

RELATED: Rothschild Australia and E3 International to take the lead in the global carbon trading market

France Mulls CO2 Taxes on Citizens

James Kanter
New York Times
Monday, September 7, 2009

The French government plans next year to begin making heavy users of household and transport fuels bear more of the tax burden. President Nicolas Sarkozy is expected to say in coming weeks that such a shift is necessary to nudge French citizens toward cleaner alternatives.

The tax would reportedly start at about 14 euros (or $20) for each ton of CO2 emitted, and could rise to levels of around 100 euros ($143) for each ton by 2030. That could mean substantial increases in the price of gasoline and diesel, as well as a sizable jump in the cost of keeping homes warm.

But skeptics say the idea may have less to do with clean energy, and more to do with a desire on the part of Mr. Sarkozy’s government to find new ways to keep the national debt in check.

Full story here.

I guess reducing state spending or borrowing is out of the question. You can't control people with debt if they're not in it! Spend spend spend, borrow some more. The money printers will demand interest too remember, so the state oppresses the people and wrings them dry, squeezing as much out of them as possible. You have to keep in mind that money (to us) represents production, which means it represents out time, which is life. A weeks' pay is a week of your working life gone. They want the money you earn, which is the same as them saying they want your life.

Introduction of carbon tax suggested

KILIAN DOYLE
Irish Times
Monday, September 7, 2009

The Commission on Taxation has recommended the introduction of a carbon tax to help cut Ireland’s greenhouse gas emissions.

In a report published this morning, the commission said this tax should apply to all carbon-based fuels sold for use in Ireland and should be based on the tonnes of CO2 emitted by each fuel. It said the tax could raise €500 million per year.

“The tax should be clearly visible at the point of final consumption to ensure it is not seen as ‘just another tax’”, the report said.

The Commission said a carbon tax would encourage polluters to cut emissions to save money and encourage innovation. “It is fair in the sense that those who choose to pollute the most, pay the most,” it said.

While there should be no preferential rates, businesses who are involved in the Emissions Trading Scheme should be exempt, it said.

Full story here.

Yes, supposedly free, independent countries all around the world start freely, independently pushing the same oppressive schemes.
It is enough to make you think there is a bigger picture to all of this...

I want to like the EU... but I can’t

This has been on the Msn.com front page all day. Which is nice. Nice to see level headed, healthy skepticism on the undemocratic unaccountable EU project on mainstream websites. I would buy this guy a pint, but I don't have any money left after the dual governments of Britain and the EU finished raping my arse for taxes.

John Stepek, writing for MSN Money

September 04 2009

Let me make something clear from the start of this piece: I like Europe and Europeans.

I like the idea of having closer ties to the continent. I think the Channel Tunnel's a great thing. I'm in favour of free trade and, to the extent that it's practical, open borders.

But I have to admit, the jury's out on the European Union and a lot of people feel the same way. There's been a big swing towards anti-EU parties (not just in the UK either) across Europe.

Why? EU supporters tend to claim that people just don't understand Europe. The logical conclusion from this is that they should just shut up and entrust handling it to the people who do, the politicians.

But I don't think people are that daft. If they can understand how a subprime mortgage (a pretty abstract concept in the first place) got sliced and diced and distributed in such a way as to kick off the collapse of the financial system, then they should be able to get a handle on just about anything.

Governments becoming more powerful
I think the real problem is that people feel that political power is becoming ever more distant from them. Governments seem to be getting bigger and more dictatorial and the concerns of individuals seem to be getting lost.

I think the anti-EU vote was an anti-big-government vote. But what might happen if we ended up leaving the EU? Most obviously there's the economic impact.

But what would it be? One thing that's very apparent when you try to find out anything about the EU is that no one is neutral. Everyone wants to spin a line either for or against the whole project, so it's very difficult to get any clear information.

The right-leaning think tank Civitas reckons the best estimates put the annual net cost to the UK of EU membership at £55 billion, but that includes various indirect costs that can be disputed.

So if you want a straight figure that's hard to quibble with, you can just look at our annual net contribution to the EU.

That's the amount of money we put in, minus what we get back in the form of EU spending on things like farm subsidies under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), for example. This adds up to £6.4 billion this year, a 60% jump on last year.

READ THE REST HERE

Word of advice. When someone tries to get you to sign a legally binding document by deliberately covering up the clauses and by outright lying to you. It is best to say 'no thanks'. When you say no and they come back with 'vote again', that is when you stick up two fingers and tell them to stuff their Forth Reich utopia up their collective arses, sideways.

Geo-engineering Earth is ‘good idea’

Quack alert.

A UK Royal Society study has concluded that many engineering proposals to reduce the impact of climate change are "technically possible".

Such approaches could be effective, the authors said in their report.

But they also stressed that the potential of geo-engineering should not divert governments away from their efforts to reduce carbon emissions.

No, must keep up the tax on civilisation and reducing the quality of life for everyone on Earth, elite classes excluded of course.

Such engineering projects could either remove carbon dioxide or reflect the Sun's rays away from the planet.

Fucking hell, did I wake up in a parallel universe? You remove carbon dioxide and what are the plants going to use for photosynthesis? You reflect the Sun’s rays and what are the plants going to use for photosynthesis, you know the process that converts carbon dioxide into organic compounds, especially sugars, using the energy from sunlight.

Suggestions range from having giant mirrors in space, to erecting giant CO2 scrubbers that would "clean up" the air.

This is a typo, what they actually mean is erecting giant carbon tax scams that will suck the productivity out of the human race, something that seems to be alluded to in the next quote (my emphasis).

Of the two basic geo-engineering approaches, the report concluded that those involving the removal of carbon dioxide were preferable, as they effectively return the climate system closer to its pre-industrial state.

That one sentence sums up the entire environmental movement.

Of the carbon removal techniques assessed, three were considered to have most potential:

1. CO2 capture from ambient air: This would be the preferred method, as it effectively reverses the cause of climate change.

2. Enhanced weathering: This aims to enhance natural reactions of CO2 from the air with rocks and minerals. It was identified as a prospective longer-term option.

3. Land use and afforestation: The report found that land-use management could and should play a small but significant role in reducing the growth of atmospheric CO2 concentrations.

This is the best they can come up with? And think of the absurdity of humans trying to control the entire climate. What for? Climate is supposed to change, it is COMPLETELY NATURAL. But like I said, this isn’t about nature, this is about imposing a global regime using the environment as a pretext.

Professor John Shepherd, a researcher from the University of Southampton, chaired the Royal Society's geo-engineering study.

So you know who butters his bread.

He said: "It is an unpalatable truth that unless we can succeed in greatly reducing CO2 emissions, we are headed for a very uncomfortable and challenging climate future.

Horseshit you dip stick.

"Some geo-engineering techniques could have serious unintended and detrimental effects on many people and ecosystems, yet we are still failing to take the only action that will prevent us from having to rely on them.

If it involves reducing quality of life and/ or an ever increasing state to oppress the behaviour and industry of the human race, then it is far from unintended. Still, as far as he is concerned all of that is perfectly acceptable.

Long as it doesn’t involve him I’m sure.

"Geo-engineering and its consequences are the price we may have to pay for failure to act on climate change."

There is so much evidence (as in real world, not computer models) that completely rejects this so called man-made global warming cooling. Another thing, why do these state funded talking heads refer to climate change like it is something new? The climate has always changed and always will. But then I remember it isn’t about the scientific truth of anything, it is just about stirring up irrational responses, creating fear and advocating global governance and central control as the solution.

“The threat of environmental crisis will be the ‘international disaster key’ that will unlock the New World Order.” – Mikhail Gorbachev, quoted in “A Special Report: The Wildlands Project Unleashes Its War On Mankind”, by Marilyn Brannan, Associate Editor, Monetary & Economic Review, 1996, p. 5

And if you wonder what he meant by ‘new world order’;

“We are moving toward a new world order, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.” — Mikhail Gorbachev 1987

Also remember that they tried this shit in the 70’s and nature decided to prove them wrong.

This cooling has already killed hundreds of thousands of people. If it continues and no strong action is taken, it will cause world famine, world chaos and world war, and this could all come about before the year 2000. — Lowell Ponte “The Cooling”, 1976

If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder by the year 2000…This is about twice what it would take to put us in an ice age. — Kenneth E.F. Watt on air pollution and global cooling, Earth Day (1970)

Funny, I don’t have to ice stake to work. But I don’t have to swim there either.