Geo-engineering Earth is ‘good idea’

Quack alert.

A UK Royal Society study has concluded that many engineering proposals to reduce the impact of climate change are "technically possible".

Such approaches could be effective, the authors said in their report.

But they also stressed that the potential of geo-engineering should not divert governments away from their efforts to reduce carbon emissions.

No, must keep up the tax on civilisation and reducing the quality of life for everyone on Earth, elite classes excluded of course.

Such engineering projects could either remove carbon dioxide or reflect the Sun's rays away from the planet.

Fucking hell, did I wake up in a parallel universe? You remove carbon dioxide and what are the plants going to use for photosynthesis? You reflect the Sun’s rays and what are the plants going to use for photosynthesis, you know the process that converts carbon dioxide into organic compounds, especially sugars, using the energy from sunlight.

Suggestions range from having giant mirrors in space, to erecting giant CO2 scrubbers that would "clean up" the air.

This is a typo, what they actually mean is erecting giant carbon tax scams that will suck the productivity out of the human race, something that seems to be alluded to in the next quote (my emphasis).

Of the two basic geo-engineering approaches, the report concluded that those involving the removal of carbon dioxide were preferable, as they effectively return the climate system closer to its pre-industrial state.

That one sentence sums up the entire environmental movement.

Of the carbon removal techniques assessed, three were considered to have most potential:

1. CO2 capture from ambient air: This would be the preferred method, as it effectively reverses the cause of climate change.

2. Enhanced weathering: This aims to enhance natural reactions of CO2 from the air with rocks and minerals. It was identified as a prospective longer-term option.

3. Land use and afforestation: The report found that land-use management could and should play a small but significant role in reducing the growth of atmospheric CO2 concentrations.

This is the best they can come up with? And think of the absurdity of humans trying to control the entire climate. What for? Climate is supposed to change, it is COMPLETELY NATURAL. But like I said, this isn’t about nature, this is about imposing a global regime using the environment as a pretext.

Professor John Shepherd, a researcher from the University of Southampton, chaired the Royal Society's geo-engineering study.

So you know who butters his bread.

He said: "It is an unpalatable truth that unless we can succeed in greatly reducing CO2 emissions, we are headed for a very uncomfortable and challenging climate future.

Horseshit you dip stick.

"Some geo-engineering techniques could have serious unintended and detrimental effects on many people and ecosystems, yet we are still failing to take the only action that will prevent us from having to rely on them.

If it involves reducing quality of life and/ or an ever increasing state to oppress the behaviour and industry of the human race, then it is far from unintended. Still, as far as he is concerned all of that is perfectly acceptable.

Long as it doesn’t involve him I’m sure.

"Geo-engineering and its consequences are the price we may have to pay for failure to act on climate change."

There is so much evidence (as in real world, not computer models) that completely rejects this so called man-made global warming cooling. Another thing, why do these state funded talking heads refer to climate change like it is something new? The climate has always changed and always will. But then I remember it isn’t about the scientific truth of anything, it is just about stirring up irrational responses, creating fear and advocating global governance and central control as the solution.

“The threat of environmental crisis will be the ‘international disaster key’ that will unlock the New World Order.” – Mikhail Gorbachev, quoted in “A Special Report: The Wildlands Project Unleashes Its War On Mankind”, by Marilyn Brannan, Associate Editor, Monetary & Economic Review, 1996, p. 5

And if you wonder what he meant by ‘new world order’;

“We are moving toward a new world order, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.” — Mikhail Gorbachev 1987

Also remember that they tried this shit in the 70’s and nature decided to prove them wrong.

This cooling has already killed hundreds of thousands of people. If it continues and no strong action is taken, it will cause world famine, world chaos and world war, and this could all come about before the year 2000. — Lowell Ponte “The Cooling”, 1976

If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder by the year 2000…This is about twice what it would take to put us in an ice age. — Kenneth E.F. Watt on air pollution and global cooling, Earth Day (1970)

Funny, I don’t have to ice stake to work. But I don’t have to swim there either.