Harriet Harman, the feminist fuckface who believes that discriminating against men isn’t actually discrimination (maybe she doesn’t think men are people). Also, at Pat Condell points out on Youtube, another bloody feminist who claims women are oppressed, only to hear a deafening silence from them in regards to treatment of women under Islam.
You know, stoning to deaths, the rapes, the marriages of 10 year old girls to old men, honour killings, women being worth half a man etc. These are not merely the actions of a ‘few individual Muslims’. The view that women are inferior runs throughout Islam, throughout the Quran.
So, Harriet the fuckface stated that men cannot be trusted to run businesses on their own etc (what Industrial Revolution?).
In Iran, the opposite is true, when Iranian clerics object to women as cabinet ministers: "there are religious doubts over the abilities of women when it comes to management"
Quoth Ali, the rightful successor to Muhammad according to the Shi'ites:
"O' ye peoples! Women are deficient in Faith, deficient in shares and deficient in intelligence. As regards the deficiency in their Faith, it is their abstention from prayers and fasting during their menstrual period. As regards deficiency in their intelligence it is because the evidence of two women is equal to that of one man. As for the deficiency of their shares that is because of their share in inheritance being half of men. So beware of the evils of women. Be on your guard even from those of them who are (reportedly) good. Do not obey them even in good things so that they may not attract you to evils." - The Peak of Eloquence, sermon 80.
On the Sunni side of the street (sorry), this quotation is in accord with Bukhari 1.6.301:
The women asked, "O Allah's Apostle! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?" He said, "Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?" They replied in the affirmative. He said, "This is the deficiency in her intelligence. Isn't it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?" The women replied in the affirmative. He said, "This is the deficiency in her religion."
So where are all the feminists now, those femmies who say unless women are automatically given 50% of the board room and cabinet positions, (but funnily enough, not 50% of building site or scaffolding positions) they are oppressed and victims of a patriarchy, but their misandric government are importing millions of Muslims who believe women are inferior, because their prophet said so, with the ensuing rise of crimes as a result.
Hello, hello? Bunch of pussies.
2 comments:
One year ago, on the Freedom2Choose forum, I asked a question: Are MEN being emasculated? I came through the sixties and seventies as a young man when Women's Lib was the top of the news and was an ardent believer in in there cause. I found nothing to fear from women being treated as individuals equal to men in the brains department even though they may be more intelligent than me, and believe me that ain't difficult! But If I knew then how my support would be turned against me by the very party that I believed in wholeheartedly I would have fought, tooth and nail, against them. Here is what I said on the forum one year ago:
"Over the past few years and months I've been getting the uneasy feeling that there is a movement out there trying to make men subordinate... to whom exactly? Women? Quite rightly women have seen their rolls change over the last four decades or so and misogynistic men, with a controlling mentality no longer are given a free hand to use and abuse women. It was brought to the fore yesterday where a change in the law was brought in to allow women who have suffered abuse for many years and then go on to murder there husband/partner to plead a lesser crime, even though it was premeditated. Needless to say the same 'courtesy' is not given to men who do the same."
This was said by a woman here: http://www.newswithviews.com/Levant/nancy82.htm
I do believe that Harman brought out another law, and I said this:
There was also the other law that made it an offence for men to tell sexist jokes in pubs or other hospitality venue.
But I can't find a link.
Being 'sexist' I'd say fuck you Harmon, but who would?
I could say something about Muslims per the above post but that's for another day.
TheBig Yin, looks like you were right:
New sex discrimination laws also mean that landlords who allow loud sexist jokes or banter among drinkers could be taken before a tribunal.
Post a Comment